Hi all,
I have merged PR#1369[1] and bumped the requirement for the JDK used
to build `2.x` to JDK 11+, which is able to compile all our modules.
If your JAVA_HOME points to a JDK 8 installation, you'll get a build
failure.
On the other hand Maven Toolchains are no longer required, unless you
wan
Hi Piotr,
If Java 11 is the minimum requirement, the why is 8 still listed
in .github/workflows/log4j-kafka-test.yml in the PR?
Gary
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023, 3:35 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have merged PR#1369[1] and bumped the requirement for the JDK used
> to build `2.x` to JDK 1
Hi Gary,
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 12:43, Gary Gregory wrote:
> If Java 11 is the minimum requirement, the why is 8 still listed
> in .github/workflows/log4j-kafka-test.yml in the PR?
I'll check for comments referring to JDK 8 tonight.
JDK 8 is still used by the build system to run tests: there are
Hi all,
Since our website has seen better times, I asked a young designer,
Daniel Żabiński, to freshen it up a little bit.
The preliminary sketches are available at:
https://xd.adobe.com/view/455b5d92-d89b-45d9-984c-871974460249-1008/?fullscreen
Personally I like the way it looks and I think we
Great initiative Piotr! Thank you. One requirement I'd like to request is
that this looks decent on mobile, which it does not ATM, at least on Chrome
and Android 13.
Gary
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023, 4:53 PM Piotr P. Karwasz
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since our website has seen better times, I asked a young
In general I like the direction of this. The site is much more colorful.
However…
1. I really think we should have a separate web site for the log4j api.
2. The manual needs much more than just being made pretty.
Ralph
> On Aug 4, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sinc
