In general I like the direction of this. The site is much more colorful. However… 1. I really think we should have a separate web site for the log4j api. 2. The manual needs much more than just being made pretty.
Ralph > On Aug 4, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Since our website has seen better times, I asked a young designer, > Daniel Żabiński, to freshen it up a little bit. > > The preliminary sketches are available at: > > https://xd.adobe.com/view/455b5d92-d89b-45d9-984c-871974460249-1008/?fullscreen > > Personally I like the way it looks and I think we should implement it. > > This brings a lot of technical questions like: > * do we even care about Maven Site skins or should we use a different > static site generator? > * Daniel proposes a nice "Search" feature, which technology can we > use on a statically generated site? > * can we have some dynamic content backed up by Apache infrastructure? > * In the near future we'll be implementing a configuration validation > tool. I would like to use the same Javascript library for both the > tool and the rest of the website? What JS library would you propose > for interactive content. > > Piotr
