In general I like the direction of this. The site is much more colorful. 
However…
1. I really think we should have a separate web site for the log4j api.
2. The manual needs much more than just being made pretty.

Ralph

> On Aug 4, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Since our website has seen better times, I asked a young designer,
> Daniel Żabiński, to freshen it up a little bit.
> 
> The preliminary sketches are available at:
> 
> https://xd.adobe.com/view/455b5d92-d89b-45d9-984c-871974460249-1008/?fullscreen
> 
> Personally I like the way it looks and I think we should implement it.
> 
> This brings a lot of technical questions like:
> * do we even care about Maven Site skins or should we use a different
> static site generator?
> * Daniel proposes a nice "Search" feature, which technology can we
> use on a statically generated site?
> * can we have some dynamic content backed up by Apache infrastructure?
> * In the near future we'll be implementing a configuration validation
> tool. I would like to use the same Javascript library for both the
> tool and the rest of the website? What JS library would you propose
> for interactive content.
> 
> Piotr

Reply via email to