Re: [log4net] Project state

Hi Volkan That's just me replying wrongly ): I stand by what I said though. -d On 2023/11/02 11:13, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: Davyd, would you mind sharing why you didn't want to send this response to the mailing list? If there are no particular reasons, could you send it there too, please? On W

Re: [log4net] Project state

Gary is correct on this. In the past we have broken out the sub-projects under the project activity section and project health sections. You can see that in your own previous reports (and those from Matt and myself). Ralph > On Nov 1, 2023, at 5:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Not quite IMO, t

Re: [log4net] Project state

Not quite IMO, the "project" here is "Loggging Services". The components inside LS, like Log4j, and so on are different types of items and I don't think we need to address the state of each. It might be nice to do but I do not think it is needed. Gary On Wed, Nov 1, 2023, 7:47 AM Volkan Yazıcı w

[log4net] Project state

In the board report guidelines , project state is required to be described using the following keywords: - *New:* a top-level project that's just getting started - *Ongoing*, with high, moderate or low activity, which you might