Hi Volkan That's just me replying wrongly ): I stand by what I said though.
-d On 2023/11/02 11:13, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
Davyd, would you mind sharing why you didn't want to send this response to the mailing list? If there are no particular reasons, could you send it there too, please?On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:20 PM Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Yes, I'd agree that log4net is "at risk" seeing as I'm apparently the only active maintainer - and I'm not even that active, having not found time in quite a while to do some log4net work ): -d On 2023/11/01 13:47, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:In the board report guidelines <https://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting#guidelines> <https://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting#guidelines>, project state is required to be described using the following keywords: - *New:* a top-level project that's just getting started - *Ongoing*, with high, moderate or low activity, which you might quantify if appropriate - *Dormant:* not much happening on the code, but at least 3 PMC members ready to engage if needed - *At risk:* not enough active PMC members, or a significant number of contributors left the project, etc. - *Considering moving to the Attic:* a project that's about to move to the Attic, or discussing that IMO, Log4net can be classified as "at risk", right?
