Finer grained security

In our current security model, a user with DATA:MANAGE can create regions, create disk stores, WAN gateways etc. I think this is a very wide scope, because an administrator may want to give create region privilege to a developer, but not necessarily give them the ability to create disk stores or se

Re: Simple Java Client

I had looked at the JCache in the past and here are some of the things I noted: Naming convention: Geode's region is a Cache in JSR-107, and Geode's Cache is a CacheManager. I think it would be too confusing to change the meaning of cache. Also, how do you document this given that Cache means diff

Re: Simple Java Client

>>>>>>>> We agree that GFSH is a DSL, and a really good and useful one. We > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> agree > >>>>> > >>>>>> that we don't want our API tied to GFSH syntax. I view

Re: Finer grained security

gt; > > > if we want to control a specific wan, maybe we add a fourth > > > > parameter: > > > > > > > cluster:*:wan:wanName, same goes for Disk etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Jacob Barr

Re: Last call on 1.2.0 (and fixing test failures)

I think we should also wait for GEODE-2836 On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 8:58 AM Karen Miller wrote: > Let's finish GEODE-2913, the documentation for improvements made to the > Lucene integration and include it with the 1.2.0 release! > > > On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > >

Re: [jira] [Updated] (GEODE-3005) A developer can create a Region with Partition Resolution using Java API

For this reason: But since the user has to always add this delimiter to their string keys perhaps it is better for them to have to explicitly configure what it is. I would vote for a single configuration. On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:17 PM Darrel Schneider wrote: > The partition-by-prefix featur

Re: [jira] [Updated] (GEODE-3005) A developer can create a Region with Partition by Prefix using Java API

I don't see how this RoutableKey approach, which is a Java interface will work from non-java clients. So, in the interest of cross-language support and keeping the usage simple, I think we should just restrict this to work with utf-8 encoded strings with a delimiter. I agree however that this shou

Re: Do you want to Tweet for @ApacheGeode?

So can I. On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:40 PM Michael Stolz wrote: > Hey Greg, > > I could tweet now and then. > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager > Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 <(631)%20835-4771> > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > Greetings Apache

Re: SecurityService versus Cluster Config

I think we should revisit connecting to the distributed system with properties. In addition to what Kirk mentioned below, I think one of the big limitation of this is the inability to change properties on a running cluster. If there is a property that a user needs to change, they will have to bounc

Re: Apache Geode + Narayana JTA = Global Transactions with Last-Resource Optimization

Great work Christian! Can you add a page about this on the wiki as well, so that your work is not lost. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 10:58 AM Dan Smith wrote: > Awesome! > > -Dan > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 6:08 AM, Christian Tzolov > wrote: >

Re: Apache Geode + Narayana JTA = Global Transactions with Last-Resource Optimization

k we did for a > > Pivotal customer and will benefit the entire community. > > > > Cheers, > > John > > > > > > [1] https://jira.spring.io/browse/DATAGEODE-16 > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:53 PM, John Blum wrote: > >

Re: New Committer: Deepak Dixit

Welcome Deepak! On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 8:45 PM Amey Barve wrote: > Welcome Deepak and Congratulations! > > Regards, > Amey > > On 16 Jul 2017 2:37 am, "Nitin Lamba" wrote: > > Welcome Deepak! > Nitin > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Avinash Dongre > wrote: > > > Welcome Deepak ! > > > > T

[DISCUSS] authorizing function execution

Discuss fix for GEODE-2817 Currently to execute a function, you will need "data:write" permission, but it really depends on what the function is doing. For example, if a function is just reading data, the function author might want users with DATA

Re: How to export region keys in json file

I think you need to wrap the entire json string in quotes. From GEODE-3001 : gfsh>put --key-class=io.pivotal.gemfire.testing.MyKey --key="{'identifier': 'KIWI131117+65', 'name':'name'}" --value=foo2 --region=/foo On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 6:15 AM

Re: [DISCUSS] authorizing function execution

considering that Jared was > talking > >>> about adding a @RegisterableFunction annotation as well. maybe > something > >>> like @ResourcePermission("Data:READ") or something like that? > >>> > >>> -Dan > >>> > >>> On Thu, Aug 1

Re: [Discuss] Enable region set operations to start JTA transactions

How is this going to work for a PartitionedRegion? Are we going to throw TransactionDataNotColocatedException when iterating over non-colocated data in the PR? If so, how useful is this work going to be if the set ops always throw exceptions? If not, then that will mean we have to maintain a txSta

Re: 1.3.0 release

Sound good. I would like to volunteer to be the release manager. Thanks! On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:24 PM Anthony Baker wrote: > Hi all, > > I think we should begin discussing scope and timeline for the 1.3.0 > release. I know we’re still finalizing 1.2.1, but we released 1.2.0 almost > two m

Re: [DISCUSS] authorizing function execution

ice.onRegion, and is > > >> intended to allow Function authors to require different permissions > > >> depending on the Region which Function will be executed on. We pass > the > > >> region name into this method rather than the full FunctionContext > > bec

Re: 1.3.0 release

r 1.3.0 (I > think it’s probably not accurate) and gather consensus on any remaining > changes needed? > > Anthony > > > On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > > Sound good. > > > > I would like to volunteer to be the release manag

Re: [DISCUSS] GEODE-3617 Replace gemfire prefix with geode

In the interest of keeping the re-branding tasks together, I took the liberty to made GEODE-3617 a subtask of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1466. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:05 PM Dave Barnes wrote: > Here's an updated link to the properties spreadsheet that should have wider > viewa

Re: [DISCUSS] Addition of isValid API to Index interface

Sorry for not reading this thread earlier, but I was wondering what is the point of just invalidating the index and having it lie around if it is not going to be used? Can we just drop the index instead, and log a warning message to that effect? This will free up the memory used by the index and wi

Re: [DISCUSS] Addition of isValid API to Index interface

in case of PR indexes]. We were also > worried about race conditions arising in that case. > > Regards > Nabarun > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:59 PM Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > Sorry for not reading this thread earlier, but I was wondering what is > the

Re: [DISCUSS] Addition of isValid API to Index interface

case where we hit an > > exception updating an index? The objective of these changes is to fix a > > window where we are leaving the system in a corrupt state, I think we > > should do that in the least complicated way possible. > > > > -Dan > > > > On Wed

Re: New Geode PMC Member: Galen O'Sullivan

Welcome Galen! On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:46 PM Alexander Murmann wrote: > Congratulations, Galen! > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Mark Bretl wrote: > > > The Apache Geode Project Management Committee has invited Galen > > O'Sullivan to join the Geode PMC and we are pleased to announce he

Re: New Geode PMC Member: Galen O'Sullivan

We have a list of committers here: http://geode.apache.org/community/ but we don't have a list of PMC on the geode site. Mark, do you maintain one? On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:09 AM Michael Stolz wrote: > Where can I see the list of PMC members? > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer - Gemfire P

Re: 1.3.0 release

85 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3685> MBean wrappers are not always applied correctly GEODE-3723 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-3723> Reconsider using Optional as the parameter for getRequiredPermissions On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:11 PM Swapnil Bawaskar

Re: New client protocol configuration

As a geode admin setting up the cluster with security, I don't want to worry about what version of protocol the client is going to use. +1 for the new protocol to just use existing properties. On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 1:24 PM Dan Smith wrote: > I realized I've been assuming you were asking about t

Re: 1.3.0 release

GEODE-3743: Deprecate option for manual restart of Gateway senders For GEODE-3247 the implementation is complete, documentation pending. I hope to cut the release branch and have a release candidate early next week. Thanks! Swapnil. On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 9:31 AM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: >

Re: 1.3.0 release

All issues targeted for 1.3.0 have been resolved. I will cut a release candidate shortly. On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 11:18 AM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Hi All, > Thanks for all your efforts in resolving a whopping 51 issues in the past > week! Since I did not hear any concerns, I removed

[VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC1

This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.3.0. I will send out a separate vote thread for geode-examples. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! *** Please download, test and vote by Monday, October 16, 0800 hrs US Pacific. *** It fixes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC1

. I will dig into it tomorrow. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:43 AM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.3.0. I > will send out a separate vote thread for geode-examples. > Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to t

Re: version for JIRA tickets?

Yes, please do Bruce. Thanks! On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:07 AM Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > Shall I bump the actual product version to 1.4.0? Swapnil bumped the > version that gradle knows about but didn't update Version.java > > > On 10/13/17 8:24 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > Fixed! > > > > https

Re: version for JIRA tickets?

Kirk, you can checkout release/1.3.0 to verify. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:05 AM Kirk Lund wrote: > I have a couple commits from yesterday (and maybe 1 from Wed) that I still > need to close the corresponding Jira ticket for. How do I determine if the > commit made it into 1.3 or will instead be

[VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC2

This is the second release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.3.0. I will send out a separate vote thread for geode-examples. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! *** Please download, test and vote by Monday, October 16, 0800 hrs US Pacific. *** It fixes

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC2

I forgot to update the vote deadline. Please vote by Wednesday 10/18 by 8:00am PST. Thanks! On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:39 PM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > This is the second release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.3.0. I > will send out a separate vote thread for geode-examples. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC2

wnstream dependencies affected by this change? > > Anthony > > > > On Oct 13, 2017, at 1:39 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > > This is the second release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.3.0. I > > will send out a separate vote thread for geode

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC2

examples - > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Steps. > > > > I don't think the examples release needs to wait for the outstanding PRs, > > unless any of those are critical for 1.3.0? > > > > -Dan > > > > On Tue, Oct 17,

[VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC3

This is the third release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.3.0. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! *** Please download, test and vote by Monday, October 23, 0800 hrs US Pacific. *** It fixes 376 issues. release notes can be found at: https://issues.a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC3

1.3.0.RC3 > tagger Swapnil Bawaskar 1508355792 +0530 > > Release candidate 3 for 1.3.0 > gpg: Signature made Wed Oct 18 12:43:21 2017 PDT > gpg:using RSA key 8F8F2BCC18F902DB > gpg: Good signature from "Swapnil Bawaskar " [full] > > This is different

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC3

I noticed that my svn commit had failed. The geode distribution should be available now. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 7:32 PM Anthony Baker wrote: > The dist location only has the examples. Where are the geode > distributions? > > Anthony > > > On Oct 20, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Swap

Re: [DISCUSS] Storage-class memory ecosystem program

Thanks Roman! I have volunteered to be on that group, if anyone else is interested, please chime in on that email thread. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:57 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > FYI > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Gang(Gary) Wang > Date: Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:10 AM >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC3

gz > > apache-geode-1.3.0-src.zip > > apache-geode-1.3.0.tgz > > apache-geode-1.3.0.zip > > > > -1 until this is fixed. > > > > Anthony > > > > > On Oct 24, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar > > wrote: > > > > > > I noti

[VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC4

This is the fourth release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.3.0. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! *** Please download, test and vote by Sunday, October 29, 1200 hrs US Pacific. *** It fixes 376 issues. release notes can be found at: https://issues.

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.3.0 RC4

The vote passes with 4 +1 binding votes. +1 Anthony Baker +1 Dan Smith +1 Bruce Schuchardt +1Jared Stewart Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geode-dev/201710.mbox/%3ccanzq1gd-uj9ko4+8t+qngrorsgbdkw83ohnf9j8wpydgevu...@mail.gmail.com%3E

1.3.0 release in JIRA

Can someone please mark 1.3.0 as RELEASED in JIRA? I don't seem to have permission. Thanks! Swapnil.

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.3.0

We would like to thank all the contributors that made the release possible. Regards, Swapnil Bawaskar on behalf of the Apache Geode team

Re: [Discussion] SQL+Streaming/JDBC as one of the unified interfaces

Hi Christian and Julian, This indeed sounds very promising. Looking at the formidable list of "Powered by Calcite " projects, I think we should explore embedding Calcite in Geode. On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:52 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > I'm Julian Hyde

Re: [Discussion] Geode-Native Removing Stats from Public API

A lot of statistics we have are exposed over JMX. I think we should make an effort to expose all the stats over JMX, making them consumable with existing tooling rather than investing in jVSD. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:32 PM Addison Huddy wrote: > Thanks for the clarification Jake. So yes, I'm i

Testing your application

In 1.3.0, a new JUnit Rule has been introduced which makes writing integration/acceptance tests for application easier. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Test+your+application Please give it a spin. All feedback welcome.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Spring Data Geode 2.0.2.RELEASE (Kay SR2) Available!

This is awesome! Thanks John. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:36 AM Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > Another great release from the Spring world!! > > --Udo > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:39 PM, John Blum wrote: > > > Greetings Apache Geode Community- > > > > It is my pleasure to announce the availability of *

Re: Next release: 1.4.0

I would like to volunteer as a release manager. Currently there are 14 issues that are marked for 1.4.0. If you are working on any of these, can you please update the JIRA? https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=92&projectKey=GEODE&view=planning&selectedIssue=GEODE-3688&ver

Re: Next release: 1.4.0

merge. > > Sarge > > > On 28 Nov, 2017, at 10:03, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > > I would like to volunteer as a release manager. > > Currently there are 14 issues that are marked for 1.4.0. If you are > working > > on any of these, can you please

Re: Geode listed on the top 10 most active mailing lists @ Apache in 2017

Wohoo! Also, in 2017 our downloads went up from ~5k in Jan to ~30k in Oct. graph below: https://imgur.com/QOk7nu4 On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 10:26 PM William Markito Oliveira < william.mark...@gmail.com> wrote: > Congrats everyone, Happy new year! > > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/apa

Re: Using partition resolver via gfsh command vs XML config

The release branch for 1.3 was cut before the date mentioned by Jinmei, so the fix has not been released yet. Can you please try again against a build on develop? We hope to have a RC of 1.4 out soon. On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:23 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > According to the context of where that messag

Re: Next release: 1.4.0

ase branch for 1.4.0. Can someone please update the concourse pipelines to pick up this release branch? Thanks! On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:58 PM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Well, making sure that the JIRA's status is up-to-date and removing the > 1.4.0 version tag if the fix can wait for a la

Concourse ci access

Hi, Can I please get access to concourse so as to kick off builds? Thanks!

[VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.4.0 RC1

This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.4.0. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! *** Please download, test and vote by Friday, January 26, 1200 hrs US Pacific. *** It fixes 277 issues. release notes can be found at: https://issues.a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.4.0 RC1

d-sourcing a condensed version here: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-1.4.0 > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Notes#ReleaseNotes-1.4.0 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > Anthony >

Re: Proposal: GEODE-4367 - Return PDXInstance when Domain Object can't be found

+1 to making PDX being more usable by adding an API rather than the current flag. I also think we should make the client-side usage of PDX simpler by always using ReflectionBasedAutoSerializer when no serialization mechanism has been specified see GEODE-2722

Re: [PROPOSAL]: Adding declarable support in Gfsh command

+1 for ability to pass in simple key-value pairs. Would it be possible to loose the "?" between the class name and the json though? Also, since we are essentially trying to pass a java.util.Properties object to the Declarable, would it be better if we ask the users to pass-in a string representati

[VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.4.0 RC2

After fixing the security concerns in the first release candidate, this is the second release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.4.0. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! *** Please download, test and vote by Thursday, Feb 1, 1400 hrs US Pacific. *** It

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.4.0 RC2

wrote: > +1 > > - Download src and binary dists > - Confirmed all dists extract > - Confirmed src builds > - Confirmed version and gfsh commands > - Reviewed LICENSE and NOTICE contents > - Reviewed maven distribution but didn't consume > > -Dick > > &

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Geode release - 1.4.0 RC2

Can someone please close the 1.4.0 release in JIRA? I don't have enough privilege. On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 3:27 PM Xiaojian Zhou wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > This vote passes with five +1 votes, no 0 or -1 votes. >

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.4.0

The release artifacts can be downloaded from the project website: http://geode.apache.org/releases/ The release documentation is available at: http://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/14/about_geode.html We would like to thank all the contributors that made the release possible. Regards, Swapnil

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.4.0

-1.4.0 The release artifacts can be downloaded from the project website: http://geode.apache.org/releases/ The release documentation is available at: http://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/14/about_geode.html We would like to thank all the contributors that made the release possible. Regards, Swapnil

Re: Next release: 1.5.0

I will take up the release management task for 1.5.0 On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:03 PM Dave Barnes wrote: > Status on the 3 doc issues: > GEODE-4737 / GEODE-3915: JSON args in gfsh - Karen's got it covered > GEODE-4101: redirect-output - Dave, in process, on track > GEODE-3948: client timeout -

Re: Next release: 1.5.0

ut - Done > GEODE-3948: client timeout - Done > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > I will take up the release management task for 1.5.0 > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:03 PM Dave Barnes wrote: > > > > > Status on t

Re: [PROPOSAL]: concurrent bucket moves during rebalance

Given that there is already support for parallel rebalancing among regions, I do not see the value in supporting parallel rebalancing of buckets. If we end up doing this anyway, I would suggest to not rely on "parameters" for throttling, as these parameters would have to be configured in advance w

[VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

This is the first release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.5.0. Thanks to all the community members for their contributions to this release! *** Please download, test and vote by Friday, March 23, 1500 hrs US Pacific. *** It fixes 234 issues. release notes can be found at: https://issues.apa

Re: [DISCUSS] New List for Commit and CI Emails

I don't think we should send ci to a different email list for it to be ignored. We ideally should be in a place where emails from ci are not the norm but an exception which prompts immediate action. On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:05 PM Dan Smith wrote: > +1 to removing all automated messages from dev

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

elease (you could just delete them from SVN), but > we're not supposed to be distributing .md5 files anymore. > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums > > -Dan > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > Thi

Re: [DISCUSS] New List for Commit and CI Emails

I know travis is already configured to send emails only when the build breaks and then when it is fixed. Is concourse configured the same? On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:38 AM Patrick Rhomberg wrote: > I'm with Swapnil on this one. I think the way we make it less noisy is to > take the time to fix t

Re: Recreate Cache -- is it possible?

Does this mean auto-reconnect is broken as well? On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:28 AM Jinmei Liao wrote: > Bruce: this sounds like the root cause of the differences between the dunit > test and reall app test. > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Bruce Schuchardt > > wrote: > > > It's likely that

Re: [Proposal] Gfsh Command Feature Flag Annotation

I like @Disabled too. On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:02 PM Michael William Dodge wrote: > I kind of like @Disabled instead. > > Sarge > > > On 19 Mar, 2018, at 11:58, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > > > > I wonder if this proposal could not be extended to the greater GEODE > product. As this feature flaggin

Re: [Proposal] Gfsh Command Feature Flag Annotation

is only introducing public API, I don't see how we could hide it using an annotation. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 4:46 PM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > I like @Disabled too. > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:02 PM Michael William Dodge > wrote: > >> I kind of like @Disabled inste

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0 RC1

r many when they encounter it. > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Dan Smith wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Run geode-release-check. Verified no MD5 files in the distribution. > >> > >> -Dan > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018

Re: Logging in to concourse.apachegeode-ci.info

Can I please get access to start jobs in concourse? my github username is sbawaska On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 10:24 AM Sean Goller wrote: > Yeah, the geode pipelines are completely public. You don't need to log into > concourse to see anything, only to pause, kill or start jobs. Any changes > made

[VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

Both issues mentioned in the RC1 vote thread have been resolved. This is the second release candidate for Apache Geode, version 1.5.0. Thanks to all the community members for

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Geode 1.5.0.RC2

This vote passes with six +1 votes, one 0 and zero -1 votes. Summary: Sai Boorlagadda +1 Michael Stolz +1 Dan Smith +1 Jinmei Liao +1 Bruce Schuchardt +1 John Blum +0 Anthony Baker +1 On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 10:15 AM Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > Sounds like its suggestion to improve the process...

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.5.0

documentation is available at: http://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/15/about_geode.html We would like to thank all the contributors that made the release possible. Regards, Swapnil Bawaskar on behalf of the Apache Geode team

Re: [DISCUSS] Release 1.6.0

Mike, The release steps are fairly well documented at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/Release+Steps I will be happy to help if you have any questions. On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:03 PM Michael Stolz wrote: > I would really appreciate the opportunity to learn how to do the releas

Re: [gemfire-pm] Geode 1.6.0 RC1

+1 On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:30 AM Michael Stolz wrote: > The concourse pipeline is green. > Can I go ahead and start the build for RC1? > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Lead > Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 <(631)%20835-4771> > Download the GemFire book here. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geode 1.6.0 RC1

+1 On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 2:19 PM Dan Smith wrote: > +1 > > Ran geode-release-check, looks good to me. > > -Dan > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > Ok, thanks Galen. AFAICT, the KEYS file being referred to is this one: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/

Re: Geospatial command support in Redis adapter

Thanks Aditya! I believe this will indeed be a useful contribution! We as a community have an agreement that each commit should have a JIRA ticket. If you can register on https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa, and let us know your username, someone here will give you permission to c

Re: Concerning Apache Geode 1.7.0

The artifacts probably have not been uploaded yet. I would wait for a vote thread on the release candidate. On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:10 PM John Blum wrote: > I see that the branch for Apache Geode 1.7.0 (release/1.7.0 [1]) has been > created in preparation for the upcoming the 1.7 release. > > I

Re: [Discuss] showcasing community work

Would it make sense to put these under an "extensions" page, rather than a "community" page? On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:05 PM Sai Boorlagadda wrote: > Thanks, John for your inputs. I will be adding the page to capture these > details. > If there are no objections then I would go ahead and add a n

FOSDEM

If anyone intending to travel to FOSDEM, please sign up for a booth slot for Geode. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/FOSDEM+2019 Thanks!

Re: Removal of distributed transaction tests

Implementation for distributed transactions was started but has not been completed yet. The tests may only be testing what has been implemented so far, so I would vote not to remove these tests. On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:57 PM Kirk Lund wrote: > My reasoning is simple: Apache Geode does not curren

Re: GeodeRedisAdapter improvments/feedback

The Redis adapter was designed so that we can scale all the Redis data structures horizontally. If you bring the data structures to region entry level, there is no reason for anyone to use our implementation over Redis. On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:15 PM Jason Huynh wrote: > Hi Hitesh, > > Not sure

PROXY and CACHING_PROXY regions on Client

GEODE-1887 was filed to make sure that the user experience while using Geode is similar to RDBMS and other data products out there. While reviewing the pull request I realized that we need to make other op

Re: PROXY and CACHING_PROXY regions on Client

ce.html#getRegion(java.lang.String) > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > Introducing an API like this gives us the opportunity to split the > > client/server region API’s. I don’t think we should return Region, but > > something specific to “s

Re: PROXY and CACHING_PROXY regions on Client

region, so it is most likely being used when the client is shutting down, so fixing existing applications should be straight forward. On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 12:27 PM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > @John The intention behind this proposal is to make Geode client > development easy for new use

Re: Requesting more JIRA permission

+1 On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 4:29 PM Jared Stewart wrote: > +1 > > > On Feb 15, 2017, at 4:27 PM, Michael William Dodge > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > >> On 15 Feb, 2017, at 16:17, Addison Huddy wrote: > >> > >> Hello Apache Geode Community, > >> > >> I'm writing to request a higher level of permissi

Re: GeodeRedisAdapter improvments/feedback

I think we as a community need to determine what value do we want to add with the Redis adapter. Redis already does a great job storing small data structures in memory and sharding them. We do a great job of making sure that these data structures are horizontally scalable; why would we want to repl

Re: [jira] [Created] (GEODE-2435) Redis adapter MULTI behavior is different from Redis

Indeed, all you need to do is set -Dgemfire.ALLOW_PERSISTENT_TRANSACTIONS to true On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:22 PM Michael Stolz wrote: > This looks like the persistence with transactions issue that Gemfire has. > There is a system property to allow it to work > > -- > Mike Stolz > Principal Engi

Re: [DISCUSS] changes to Redis implementation

Accepting this pull request as-is will break backwards compatibility. I think if the new behavior is desired, it should be based on some configuration. On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:40 AM Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > I think in this case it would be replacing the messages used to > replicate changes w

Re: export logs and stats

+1 for restricting the file extensions and looking at what the user has defined. On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:46 PM Jinmei Liao wrote: > Yeah, before we were simply looking at System.getProperty("user.dir") to > get all the logs/stats, now I think we should use whatever user defined in > the config

Re: Geode log levels vs. log4j log levels

+1 to making the change and updating the docs to reflect only the new log levels. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:45 AM Jinmei Liao wrote: > Hi, all, > > Geode, before using log4j for logging has implemented its own LogWriters > and logLevels. Geode log levels has values like "finest, finer, fine, >

Re: GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface (Please read)

Here is the link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-2714 Hi Hitesh, Before executing a function, we build a list of buckets that the function needs to execute on and then we build the function context using only those buckets. So, as long as the function is using the context to get the

Re: GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface (Please read)

the > primary bucket. > > Thanks. > Hitesh > -- > *From:* Swapnil Bawaskar > *To:* dev@geode.apache.org; Hitesh Khamesra > *Sent:* Friday, March 24, 2017 1:55 PM > *Subject:* Re: GEODE-2714 Proposal for new api on Function interface > (Pleas

  1   2   3   >