Would it make sense to put these under an "extensions" page, rather than a "community" page?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:05 PM Sai Boorlagadda <sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, John for your inputs. I will be adding the page to capture these > details. > If there are no objections then I would go ahead and add a new section to > http://geode.apache.org/community/ > > Sai > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:07 PM John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > This is a very nice idea Sai. > > > > Perhaps a page with a table containing... > > > > * Project Name > > * Project Description (Summary) > > * Project License > > * Project URL (to GitHub page, Website, etc, where users can find out > more > > information) > > > > Food for thought. > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Sai Boorlagadda < > > sai.boorlaga...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > I would like to discuss what's best to capture all the community work > in > > > one place. There are some good plugins/extensions that are built by the > > > community which does not necessarily be merged into the mainstream but > > > would be a great value for others in the community. Capturing all these > > at > > > one place would a great help for someone looking for a solution. > > > > > > Also, I would like to capture (if any) requirements (Eg: licenses etc) > > that > > > these developers need to adhere to showcase their work. Are there any > > > Apache guidelines for such work? > > > > > > There are many ways to do this. if everyone agrees about the idea of > > > capturing all at one place then I propose we add a page/section > capturing > > > both the requirements and a table of references URLs to those > open-source > > > work. That way it easy for someone to update the page and create a PR > for > > > the website. > > > > > > Sai > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -John > > john.blum10101 (skype) > > >
