[PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13

2020-05-21 Thread Ju@N
Hello devs, I'd like to propose bringing *GEODE-8150 [1] *to the *support/1.13* branch. The ticket is basically to revert the upgrade of the *classgraph* [2] library, we found some performance issues that are not addressed even when using the latest released version, the full details can be seen i

Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13

2020-05-21 Thread Anthony Baker
+1 thanks Juan > On May 21, 2020, at 8:12 AM, Ju@N wrote: > > Hello devs, > > I'd like to propose bringing *GEODE-8150 [1] *to the *support/1.13* branch. > The ticket is basically to revert the upgrade of the *classgraph* [2] > library, we found some performance issues that are not addressed ev

Proposal to backport GEODE-8167

2020-05-21 Thread Owen Nichols
Some automated scans have flagged Geode Pulse as potentially containing “high" security vulnerability CVE-2020-5407. Analysis shows that this saml vulnerability is not applicable to Geode Pulse. It is low risk to bump the spring-security dependency to the latest version to avoid false positives

Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13

2020-05-21 Thread Owen Nichols
+1 While I’d rather see us go all the way back to 4.0.6, this seems like a step in that direction. > On May 21, 2020, at 8:30 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > +1 thanks Juan > >> On May 21, 2020, at 8:12 AM, Ju@N wrote: >> >> Hello devs, >> >> I'd like to propose bringing *GEODE-8150 [1] *to

Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167

2020-05-21 Thread Anthony Baker
+1 > On May 21, 2020, at 8:51 AM, Owen Nichols wrote: > > Some automated scans have flagged Geode Pulse as potentially containing > “high" security vulnerability CVE-2020-5407. > > Analysis shows that this saml vulnerability is not applicable to Geode Pulse. > > It is low risk to bump the spr

Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167

2020-05-21 Thread Ju@N
+1 On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 16:53, Anthony Baker wrote: > +1 > > > On May 21, 2020, at 8:51 AM, Owen Nichols wrote: > > > > Some automated scans have flagged Geode Pulse as potentially containing > “high" security vulnerability CVE-2020-5407. > > > > Analysis shows that this saml vulnerability is

Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13

2020-05-21 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1.. On May 21, 2020, 8:12 AM -0700, Ju@N , wrote: Hello devs, I'd like to propose bringing *GEODE-8150 [1] *to the *support/1.13* branch. The ticket is basically to revert the upgrade of the *classgraph* [2] library, we found some performance issues that are not addressed even when using the late

Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167

2020-05-21 Thread Dick Cavender
+1 On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:57 AM Ju@N wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 16:53, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > On May 21, 2020, at 8:51 AM, Owen Nichols wrote: > > > > > > Some automated scans have flagged Geode Pulse as potentially containing > > “high" security vulnerability C

Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13

2020-05-21 Thread Ju@N
Looks like there's enough consensus already (three +1s), so I've cherry picked the commit into support/1.13 branch [1]. Best regards. [1]: https://github.com/apache/geode/commit/281937d17df639cd416f0e6ce47dd73ed9e8595f On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 17:16, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1.. > On May 21, 2020,

Re: [PROPOSAL]: GEODE-8150 into support/1.13

2020-05-21 Thread Dave Barnes
Please proceed with the proposed merge, Juan. Thanks, Dave On 2020/05/21 16:15:59, Udo Kohlmeyer wrote: > +1.. > On May 21, 2020, 8:12 AM -0700, Ju@N , wrote: > Hello devs, > > I'd like to propose bringing *GEODE-8150 [1] *to the *support/1.13* branch. > The ticket is basically to revert the up

Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167

2020-05-21 Thread Udo Kohlmeyer
+1 On May 21, 2020, 8:51 AM -0700, Owen Nichols , wrote: Some automated scans have flagged Geode Pulse as potentially containing “high" security vulnerability CVE-2020-5407. Analysis shows that this saml vulnerability is not applicable to Geode Pulse. It is low risk to bump the spring-security d

Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167

2020-05-21 Thread Dave Barnes
Please add this change to support/1.13, Owen. Thanks, Dave On 2020/05/21 16:19:49, Dick Cavender wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:57 AM Ju@N wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 16:53, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > On May 21, 2020, at 8:51 AM, Owen Nichol

Re: Proposal to backport GEODE-8167

2020-05-21 Thread Owen Nichols
Done! > On May 21, 2020, at 9:50 AM, Dave Barnes wrote: > > Please add this change to support/1.13, Owen. > Thanks, > Dave > > On 2020/05/21 16:19:49, Dick Cavender wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:57 AM Ju@N wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 16:53, Anthony Baker

Creating Regions Dynamically

2020-05-21 Thread 18911098...@163.com
dear: Dynamically Create Region Demo ，When Geode Server Reboot ,Lost Region instance https://geode.apache.org/docs/guide/112/developing/region_options/dynamic_region_creation.html I don't know why? Hope to help me, thanks! 18911098...@163.com