We will get these approved as soon as possible.
Regards,
Nabarun
From: Mario Ivanac
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 4:17 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: Odg: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback
Hi all,
just to remind on this topic.
Could we expand
Šalje: Anthony Baker
Poslano: 17. ožujka 2021. 18:08
Prima: dev@geode.apache.org
Predmet: Re: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback
I think for an active, healthy project community we need to balance two things
that are somewhat oppositional: make it easy to
I think for an active, healthy project community we need to balance two things
that are somewhat oppositional: make it easy to contribute and ensure the
project meets the needs of our users for stability and robust behaviors in the
face of failures.
> On Mar 17, 2021, at 9:45 AM, Jacob Barrett
> On Mar 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Nabarun Nag wrote:
>
> "the review process is taking longer now. "
> I agree that the review process is taking a bit longer, but that is the price
> I believe needs to be paid to improve the probability of good quality code is
> being merged to Geode. More eyes
Hi Alberto!
I haven’t looked at PR review throughput metrics. I know that is certainly an
interesting measure to keep an eye on w.r.t to the CODEOWNERS / CODEWATCHERS
processes. I think another equally interesting metric is the “quality” of PR
reviews. This is difficult to measure but you co
sing Apache Geode.
Regards
Nabarun
From: Alberto Gomez
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 8:46 AM
To: dev@geode.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] CODEOWNERS mechanism feedback
Hi,
It's been more than two months since the CODEOWNERS file has been in place to
automatically add reviewers
Hi,
It's been more than two months since the CODEOWNERS file has been in place to
automatically add reviewers to pull requests. While we have seen the great
benefit of having the experts in the matter being automatically assigned as
reviewers to each pull request, I have the feeling that the re
