> On Mar 17, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Nabarun Nag <n...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
> "the review process is taking longer now. "
> I agree that the review process is taking a bit longer, but that is the price
> I believe needs to be paid to improve the probability of good quality code is
> being merged to Geode. More eyes on the code mean that more issues may be
> detected. Our goal should not be to merge code as fast as possible but
> well-vetted code goes into the codebase.
How are we going to measure this? By the time it takes between cutting a
release branch and actual release? By the number of blockers to a release
between releases? To the number of releases that have to be pulled for major
issues?
My opinion, I think we need some metric by which to quantify the positive
impact against the negative impact otherwise the drag this process has on
progress may be discouraging to people joining or staying with this community.
-Jake
