Re: Volunteers to be JIRA/confluence/mailing list admins?

Hi, I could help as confluence/jira admin. Alberto B. Obtener Outlook para iOS De: Dan Smith Enviado: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 7:52:23 PM Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Volunteers to be JIRA/confluence/mailing list admins? Hi all,

"create region" cmd stuck on wan setup

Hi Geode devs, I have been analyzing an issue that occurs in the following scenario: 1) I start two Geode clusters (cluster1 & cluster2) with one locator and two servers each. Both clusters host a partitioned region called "testregion", which is replicated using a parallel gateway sender and a

About improving GemFireIOException messages

Hi Geode devs, We received a comment of a Geode user saying that he got an error during a cache initialization and he found the error message was not too descriptive for him. The message was the following: ""Cache initialization for GemFireCache[id = 1081136680; isClosing = false; isShutDownAl

RE: Reminder to use draft mode

de-native already, because the most convenient way for us to get feedback on build/test status for all platforms is to run a change through CI, and the only way to do that is to submit it as a PR. Thanks, Blake -Original Message----- From: Alberto Bustamante

RE: Reminder to use draft mode

+1 to Mark's proposal of setting draft mode as default when creating PRs (Im wondering if a new VOTE thread is needed to approve it) And also +1 to Donal's comments. De: Darrel Schneider Enviado: jueves, 6 de mayo de 2021 21:43 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto

RE: [RFC PROPOSAL] Geode Command to replicate region data from one site to another connected via WAN

Apart from comments about the functionality, feedback about the RFC quality is welcome. Is it detailed enough? Are you missing something? It will help us to improve for next RFCs. Thanks in advance, Alberto B. De: Alberto Gomez Enviado: jueves, 22 de abril de 2

RE: CODEOWNERS vs CODEWATCHERS

Hi, Is it possible to add contributors to the CODEWATCHERS file? Or is it strictly necessary to be a committer? BR/ Alberto B. De: Owen Nichols Enviado: viernes, 12 de marzo de 2021 23:38 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: CODEOWNERS vs CODEWATCHERS The Geode

RE: Geode Native Tooling

Very good news for the native client. Thanks for the improvement Jacob! BR/ Alberto B. De: Jacob Barrett Enviado: jueves, 25 de febrero de 2021 20:49 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Re: Geode Native Tooling Running the legacy tests on windows is still flaky.

RE: Different binding addresses for traffic & membership

s that they can reach the new member at > that hostname. Any comment about what I should check first is welcome. > > Thanks! > > BR/ > > Alberto Bustamante > > > > > > > De: Alberto Bustamante Reyes > Enviado: martes, 19 de enero d

RE: Different binding addresses for traffic & membership

value of "bind-address" parameter is used to configure binding and to indicate other members that they can reach the new member at that hostname. Any comment about what I should check first is welcome. Thanks! BR/ Alberto Bustamante ____ De: Alberto

Different binding addresses for traffic & membership

Hi geode-devs, I have a question related with Geode & Kubernetes: We would like to use Istio with Geode. For that, a sidecar container (Envoy) has to be added in each Geode pod. That sidecar container intercepts and handles all incoming and outgoing traffic for that pod. One of the requirements

Reviewers needed for GEODE-8202

Hi all, Could someone take a look at PR of GEODE-8202? https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5600 It introduces a new option for serial gw sender threads startup. More info in the RFC: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GEODE/New+option+for+serial+gw+sender+dispatcher+threads+start Th

RE: Clean C++ client metadata in timeouts

my questions are: - What triggers a metadata refresh and how can we make that faster? - Can we very selectively identify that some metadata is out of date and invalidate that information only? Anthony On Sep 18, 2020, at 3:50 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes mailto:alberto.bustamant

RE: Clean C++ client metadata in timeouts

ates retries" but should be > higher > level, like "when attempting to connect, try only once, instead of > re-trying (the default behavior)." > -Dave > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 7:42 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes >

Clean C++ client metadata in timeouts

Hi geode-dev, I have a question about the c++ client. Some months ago we merged GEODE-8231 to solve a problem we observed regarding the native client was trying to connect to stopped server. GEODE-8231 solution consists on remove the client metadata when an "IO error in handshake" exception is

RE: [PROPOSAL] Remove "Fix Version/s" and "Sprint" from Jira "Create Issue" dialogue and include "Affects Version/s"

+1 De: Mario Kevo Enviado: martes, 18 de agosto de 2020 7:39 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Odg: [PROPOSAL] Remove "Fix Version/s" and "Sprint" from Jira "Create Issue" dialogue and include "Affects Version/s" +1 Šalje: Dave

Review needed for c++ client ticket

Hi, Could someone please take a look at this c++ client PR? https://github.com/apache/geode-native/pull/628 It solves a problem reported in the users list: https://markmail.org/thread/gajd4ok65w227fhl Thanks, Alberto B.

RE: [VOTE] change Default branch for geode-examples to 'develop'

+1 De: Joris Melchior Enviado: viernes, 10 de julio de 2020 15:54 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Re: [VOTE] change Default branch for geode-examples to 'develop' +1 On 2020-07-10, 12:39 AM, "Owen Nichols" wrote: A fresh checkout of geode and all but o

RE: [PROPOSAL] backport fix for GEODE-8020 to support/1.13

+1 De: Donal Evans Enviado: jueves, 9 de julio de 2020 17:50 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Re: [PROPOSAL] backport fix for GEODE-8020 to support/1.13 +1 From: Bruce Schuchardt Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:00 AM To: dev@geo

about Liberica JDK

Hi devs, I have seen in develop branch this commit that changes openjdk by Liberica JDK ( https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/5312 ), although it was reverted later so I suppose there are still issues to be solved. I didn't know Liberica and I'm curious about the change. Why is this change be

RE: Fate of master branch

+1 for deleting master branch. An also for updating the wiki page about branching that Alberto pointed out. De: Bruce Schuchardt Enviado: viernes, 26 de junio de 2020 17:37 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Re: Fate of master branch Let's just delete it. I nee

RE: [INFO] Distributed Test runs in bulk results.

I think a report like this is very useful to have real data about which flaky tests fail more often. It would be great if a report like this were automatically generated and updated after each CI execution. In a project I was working before a similar report was implemented and it was very usefu

Native client - PdxType change in "<" operator impacts performance

Hi all, I have reported a performance problem of the c++ native client, which appeared after the modification of the "<" operator of the PdxType class: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-8212 I just want to highlight it, just in case someone is facing the same issue. BR/ Alberto B.

RE: [DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start

reached if the deadline has been reached. Thank you for extending. —Udo On May 29, 2020, 12:02 PM -0700, Alberto Bustamante Reyes , wrote: Hi Udo, Thanks for your message, I was not sure if I had to receive explicit +1 messages or not. Of course I prefer to have some feedback before continue so I

RE: [DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start

accommodate the extra 1 week extension request. —Udo On May 29, 2020, 1:56 AM -0700, Alberto Bustamante Reyes , wrote: Hi, No comments have been received so far. I have moved the RFC to "in development" state and I will continue with the code implementation. BR/

RE: [DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start

Hi, No comments have been received so far. I have moved the RFC to "in development" state and I will continue with the code implementation. BR/ Alberto B. ____ De: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Enviado: sábado, 23 de mayo de 2020 0:26 Para: dev@geode.apache.o

[DISCUSS] RFC: New option for serial gw sender dispatcher threads start

Hi Geode community, I have posted on the wiki a new RFC about implementing a new option for serial gateway sender creation related with how the dispatcher threads are started. This option will be used only when gateway receivers are configured to share same host and port. This configuration was

RE: Question about version checks inside fromData method in GatewaySenderEventImpl

Hi Juan Jose, I think Alberto is asking about how the check is done, not about why its done. The method he is asking about is mixing the two ways we know for handling backward compatibility. One is creating the "toDataPre_GEODE_X_X_X" and "fromDataPre_GEODE_X_X_X" methods. And the other one is

RE: About "change loglevel" command

es and now moved to geode-log4j). On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 8:40 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes wrote: > Thanks Kirk. Could I ask what was the reason behind this change? In older > Geode version (1.10 I think) we were using our own log4j files, and the > command was working fine. > > Digging

Re: Website refresh (was Re: [DISCUSS] Adding Google Analytics to our website)

It would be great if the new webpage could include a search button for the user guide. BR/ Alberto B.

RE: About "change loglevel" command

is correct. If the User provides their own logging configuration (or a different logging impl such as logback) then none of the log-* configuration properties in Geode have any effect. On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:26 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes wrote: > Hi all, > > I have observed that

About "change loglevel" command

Hi all, I have observed that "change loglevel" command doesn't work if the "log4j2.xml" file used doesn't contain the "geode-default" property set to true. This requirement is not documented [1], so I would like to confirm if this is the correct behavior. If we add "geode-default=true" in our

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

Hi Dan, I have realized that after this change, if you want to do a quick test in your laptop, it will be not possible to run two servers properly. There could be different scenarios you could not test. For example, you could not test what happens when a server is restarted, as both will be con

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

n but was changed after comments on a previous PR) ____ De: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Enviado: jueves, 26 de marzo de 2020 20:17 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments Ok, I have moved the RFC then. Thanks again for

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

nk this could move to the "In Development" state > > > > From: Alberto Bustamante Reyes > Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 at 4:13 PM > To: Bruce Schuchardt , Dan Smith < > dsm...@pivotal.io>, "dev@geode.apache.org" > Cc: Jacob Barrett , Anilkumar

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

().putOutgoing(message). You can PM me any time. Dan could answer questions about his gateway work. From: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Date: Monday, March 23, 2020 at 2:18 PM To: Bruce Schuchardt , Dan Smith , "dev@geode.apache.org" Cc: Jacob Barrett , Anilkumar Gingade , Cha

RE: Spinning Geode locators using docker compose

Hi, Some months ago I was using docker compose for starting a cluster with one locator and two servers for testing purposes. You can check it here, I hope it helps: https://github.com/alb3rtobr/geode-docker BR/ Alberto B. De: vas aj Enviado: martes, 24 de marz

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

. De: Bruce Schuchardt Enviado: jueves, 19 de marzo de 2020 16:30 Para: Alberto Bustamante Reyes ; Dan Smith ; dev@geode.apache.org Cc: Jacob Barrett ; Anilkumar Gingade ; Charlie Black Asunto: Re: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments I wonder if an approach similar

RE: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project

+1 It will be easier to contribute to Geode if you just need a github account. De: Ju@N Enviado: lunes, 23 de marzo de 2020 11:13 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Re: [VOTE] Using Github issues and wiki for geode-kafka-connector project +1 On Sun, 22 Mar 2020

RE: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7832, GEODE-7853 & GEODE-7863 in Geode 1.12.0

+1 De: Donal Evans Enviado: jueves, 19 de marzo de 2020 2:14 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Re: [PROPOSAL]: Include GEODE-7832, GEODE-7853 & GEODE-7863 in Geode 1.12.0 +1 On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:53 PM Owen Nichols wrote: > +3 > > > On Mar 18, 2020, at 4

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

have been using until now, and created a new one with the current status of the solution, with one commit per issue described in the wiki: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4824 Thanks in advance! De: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Enviado: lunes, 9 de marzo de 2020

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

pings go to the same receiver data is sent to. -Dan On Wed, Mar 4, 2020, 1:31 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes wrote: I have tried setting the server affinity on the gateway sender's pool in AbstractGatewaySender class, when the server location is set, but I dont see any difference on the

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

introduce this change, setting the server affinity in the gateway sender should be introduced as a new option in the sender configuration, right? De: Dan Smith Enviado: jueves, 5 de marzo de 2020 4:41 Para: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Cc: dev@geode.apache.org ; Bruce

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

go over different connections than the data connection. -Dan On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 3:44 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Thanks for your comments, but we are not planning to use TLS, so Im afraid > the PR you are working on will not solve this problem. > >

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

d have used ServerLocation to identify servers. On 1/27/20, 8:56 AM, "Alberto Bustamante Reyes" wrote: Hi again, Status update: the simplification of the maps suggested by Jacob made useless the new proposed class containing the ServerLocation and the member id. With this refac

RE: Odg: acceptance test task failing?

Robert Houghton > *Poslano:* 17. veljače 2020. 16:02 > *Prima:* dev@geode.apache.org > *Predmet:* Re: acceptance test task failing? > > The test has been erroring consistently on develop since > > https://github.com/apache/geode/commit/1a0d9769e482f49e0c725c0d6adc75d324f88958 &g

acceptance test task failing?

Hi, After just changing some typos on a PR, I got errors on geode-connectors:acceptanceTest task, but the tests were working fine before that change. I have seen that the acceptance test task in concur has failed since last 14th February (15 executions since that day). and it seems all of them

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

ctions in this case. Any comment is welcome 🙂 Thanks, Alberto B. De: Jacob Barrett Enviado: miércoles, 22 de enero de 2020 19:01 Para: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Cc: dev@geode.apache.org ; Anilkumar Gingade ; Charlie Black Asunto: Re: WAN replication issue in cl

RE: cpu quota issue in CI

to your PR branch and that should fire a new round of checks. > On Jan 25, 2020, at 2:40 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > Hi, > > Im facing problems on a PR, some CI tasks fail at “create_instance-OpenJDK11” > step, due to a problem of “cpu quota exceed”.

cpu quota issue in CI

Hi, Im facing problems on a PR, some CI tasks fail at “create_instance-OpenJDK11” step, due to a problem of “cpu quota exceed”. For example: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/builds/128470 Could someone take a look? Thanks! Alberto B.

RE: Old geode-benchmark PRs

What about closing the PRs and creating a Jira ticket (or tickets) for the review and update of the code? If someone finds time to spend on benchmarks, at least he/she will find the tickets in Jira. De: Donal Evans Enviado: jueves, 23 de enero de 2020 16:45 Par

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

Thanks Naba & Jacob for your comments! @Naba: I have been implementing a solution as you suggested, and I think it would be convenient if the client knows the memberId of the server it is connected to. (current code is here: https://github.com/apache/geode/pull/4616 ) For example, in: Locat

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

dresses. This can be also useful for > remote-locators if they are behind a service. > > Sai > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 2:33 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > > Thanks Charlie, but the issue is not about connectivity. Summarizing the > > issue, the problem i

RE: GW sender dispatcher threads & order policy

De: Mario Kevo Enviado: miércoles, 15 de enero de 2020 18:22 Para: Alberto Bustamante Reyes ; dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Odg: GW sender dispatcher threads & order policy Hi Alberto, This is already solved in Geode 1.12.0. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-7

GW sender dispatcher threads & order policy

Hi, I have seen that if I change the default number of dispatcher threads ( 5 ) when creating a gateway sender, I get an error saying I must specify an order policy: "Must specify --order-policy when --dispatcher-threads is larger than 1." I find this odd, taking into account that the default

RE: Concourse tests logs

1578534134/ =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Test report artifacts from this job are available at: http://files.apachegeode-ci.info/builds/apache-develop-main/1.12.0-SNAPSHOT.0180/test-artifacts/1578534134/windows-unittestfiles-OpenJDK8-1.12.0-SNAPSHOT.0180.tgz --Jens On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 9:32 AM Alberto Bustam

Concourse tests logs

Hi, How could I check the tests reports from concourse executions? I see some tests failing on a PR but they work fine on my laptop, so I would like to have more info to fix them. Thanks! Alberto B.

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

I thought could work as I was reading about it. From the whiteboard I have done I think this will do ingress and egress just fine. Potentially easier then port mapping and `hostname for clients` playing around. Just something to think about. Charlie On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 3:19 AM Alberto Bus

RE: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

: viernes, 29 de noviembre de 2019 13:06 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Re: WAN replication issue in cloud native environments > On Nov 29, 2019, at 3:14 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > The reason for such a setup is deploying Geode cluster on a Kubernetes > clust

WAN replication issue in cloud native environments

Hi all, We have a problem with Geode WAN replication when GW receivers are configured with the same hostname-for-senders and port on all servers. The reason for such a setup is deploying Geode cluster on a Kubernetes cluster where all GW receivers are reachable from the outside world on the sam

RE: Cache.close is not synchronous?

+1 for fixing it. De: Anilkumar Gingade Enviado: martes, 26 de noviembre de 2019 0:24 Para: geode Asunto: Re: Cache.close is not synchronous? Looking at the code, the cache.close() and InternalCacheBuilder.create() are synchronized on "GemFireCacheImpl.class"'; i

RE: Help to reproduce GEODE-7060

leak at shutdown" bugs in the native client, and haven't seen GEODE-7060 in a couple of months or more. Thanks, Blake On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:49 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes wrote: > Hi, > > I need some info to reproduce the issue described in GEODE-7060, about an > A

Help to reproduce GEODE-7060

Hi, I need some info to reproduce the issue described in GEODE-7060, about an ACE resource leak. The ticket says the problem was seen using a test called "gemfire-node-client putall.js", but I suppose that test is not part of Geode. Could someone with access to that test describe what it is doi

Re: Website Banner Graphic

+1 De: Helena Bales Enviado: jueves, noviembre 14, 2019 7:52 p. m. Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Re: Website Banner Graphic +1 On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:47 AM Jacob Barrett wrote: > Does anyone know who is responsible for our website’s graphics. The > re

RE: Update geode-native-build image as part of release process

. De: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Enviado: martes, 12 de noviembre de 2019 13:35 Para: Anthony Baker ; dev@geode.apache.org Cc: Dick Cavender Asunto: RE: Update geode-native-build image as part of release process update: It is not possible to create the geode-native-build image based on

RE: Update geode-native-build image as part of release process

d consider extending the geode-native-build image from the geode image to make this simpler. Anthony > On Nov 11, 2019, at 2:42 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > Done! I have updated the wiki adding the steps to update the Docker image. > > https://cwiki.apache.

RE: Update geode-native-build image as part of release process

date geode-native-build image as part of release process Thanks Alberto! Maybe as a future enhancement we should consider extending the geode-native-build image from the geode image to make this simpler. Anthony > On Nov 11, 2019, at 2:42 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > Do

RE: Update geode-native-build image as part of release process

2019 17:51 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Re: Update geode-native-build image as part of release process +1 On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:38 AM Owen Nichols wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 6:46 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Som

RE: geode-native integration tests

de 2019 17:50 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: Re: geode-native integration tests > On Nov 7, 2019, at 7:41 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > Im curious about the geode-native integration tests. I have seen there are > two kind of tests, depending on the framework th

geode-native integration tests

Hi Geode community, Im curious about the geode-native integration tests. I have seen there are two kind of tests, depending on the framework they are based on. But no one of them are included in the CI executed by travis. Are they executed only as part of the Geode release process? What is the

Update geode-native-build image as part of release process

Hi all, Some time ago I opened GEODE-7056 to update the Dockerfile of the "geode-native-build", because I saw that it was using 1.6.0 although 1.9.0 was available. After this change, other ticket was needed to build and update the image in Dockerhub. I think this task (update file, build image

RE: [DISCUSS]: Commit Message Format too Short?

I think its a good idea to have an automatic mechanism to reject commits that exceed a given limit. In the previous project I was assigned we used Gerrit instead of Github, and we had an automatic check to vote -1 if your commit message exceeded the limit. Anyway, while this is decided, a quick

RE: Off-heap support deactivation

er. If you don't do the alter disk-store the first recovery will be slower but the actual region config will be stored again in the disk-store and subsequent recoveries will be fast. On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 8:28 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes wrote: > Hi all, > > Is it possible

Off-heap support deactivation

Hi all, Is it possible to change the off-heap support of a region once it is created? The idea I got from documentation is that it is possible to do it if the region is persistent, as the off-heap flag of the region can be changed using "alter disk-store". I have run the following example to c

Backward compatibility issue in 1.10

Hi, During PR review of GEODE-6871 it was found that GEODE-5222 introduced a backward compatibility issue by adding a new method to a public interface without providing a default implementation. According to comments in the PR, although the impacted interface (DiskStoreMXBean) is public, it sho

RE: resource manager requirements & recommendations

lways outperform G1”. I also think we need to do more work in this area to make G1 perform as well as CMS. Anthony [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/291 [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2017-April/thread.html#start > On Sep 11, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes &

resource manager requirements & recommendations

Hi all, Im interested on using the resource manager with G1 garbage collector. To check if it is possible, I have been reading documentation about heap memory management and I came up with some questions because there are some points in the documentation where it is not clear for me if they are

RE: Passed: Nordix/geode-native#15 (test-ci - e40e206)

-native#15 (test-ci - e40e206) Build Update for Nordix/geode-native - Build: #15 Status: Passed Duration: 1 hr, 36 mins, and 36 secs Commit: e40e206 (test-ci) Author: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Message: Test image View the changeset: https://github.com/Nordix/geode

RE: Updating geode-native-build docker image

The geode-native-build image has not been updated yet. Could someone build and push it? I could do it, but Im not a committer. If that is not a problem, my dockerhub user is alb3rtobr. De: Anthony Baker Enviado: jueves, 8 de agosto de 2019 0:54 Para: dev@geode.ap

RE: Travis-ci & geode-native repo

that was fast: I contacted Travis support and they increased the timeout for us 🙂 De: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Enviado: lunes, 26 de agosto de 2019 13:03 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: RE: Travis-ci & geode-native repo Thanks for the answer Jake (sorry

RE: Travis-ci & geode-native repo

Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a question about the CI of the Geode C++ client. I would like to set > up Travis on a fork of the geode-native repo. I thought that the only > requirements to do so was to grant permissions to the repo, but our travis &g

Travis-ci & geode-native repo

Hi, I have a question about the CI of the Geode C++ client. I would like to set up Travis on a fork of the geode-native repo. I thought that the only requirements to do so was to grant permissions to the repo, but our travis tasks are failing due to the execution timeout is 50 minutes. I dont

RE: Requirements for running distributed tests

success in getting the parallel dockerization to work consistently; so we only have a subset of tests which run in 'normal', serial mode. Hope this helps. --Jens On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 3:47 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes wrote: > Hi Geode community, > > We are trying to set up a

Requirements for running distributed tests

Hi Geode community, We are trying to set up a CI loop in our Geode fork. We have started with the tests that are run for every pull requests, but we are having problems to replicate what is done in the Apache Geode repository, so any help will be appreciated. We are not using concour, but we ar

Re: What triggers a maintenance release?

workaround. If you would like the project to do a patch release, I encourage you to make a case :-) Anthony > On Jul 10, 2019, at 2:02 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > I have not found information about this topic in the wiki, and taking into > ac

What triggers a maintenance release?

Hi all, I have not found information about this topic in the wiki, and taking into account that I cannot find any "hotfix" branch in github, maybe this has not happened yet: I would like to ask about the criteria to create a maintenance release. I suppose that a high priority bug should exist

Disk dir size units in javadoc comments

Hi all, I have observed that in the javadoc comments of setDiskDirsAndSizes method in DiskStoreFactory class, it is stated that dir sizes are expected to be in megabytes: /** * Sets the directories to which this disk store's data is written and also set the sizes in * megabytes of eac

PR review request

Hi, Two weeks ago I sent a PR to the geode-examples repo, could someone take a look? https://github.com/apache/geode-examples/pull/77 Thanks! Alberto B.

Re: Issue with full disk store directories

e a test to ilustrate this. BR/ Alberto B. ____ De: Alberto Bustamante Reyes Enviado: lunes, 6 de mayo de 2019 10:04:34 Para: dev@geode.apache.org Asunto: RE: Issue with full disk store directories Not sure if I understand your question: in the test I did, I used one

Re: [DISCUSS] require reviews before merging a PR

my two cents (although Im a newcomer here): I agree with Kirk in the point that if a PR is sent by a committer, if after "grace period" (one/two weeks?) no one reviewed it, the author could merge it. But of course he/she is free to wait for a review. I was thinking about PRs made by contribut

Re: About operating system statistics

ub.com/apache/geode/pull/3574> github.com Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Geode. In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you to ensure the following steps have been taken: For all changes: Is there... ________ De: Alberto Bustamant

RE: Issue with full disk store directories

partitioned for all your disk stores? > On Apr 24, 2019, at 3:42 AM, Alberto Bustamante Reyes > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I reported an issue in Jira, related with full disk store directories: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6652 > As I describe there, the issue i

Issue with full disk store directories

Hi all, I reported an issue in Jira, related with full disk store directories: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6652 As I describe there, the issue is that when using a disk store with directories of different sizes, when oplog files rotate, the available space of the next disk store

How to publish client stats on server

Hi Geode community, Im trying to run a simple test to check how the client stats are published on the server, but I have not been able to do it. The server is started with the statistic sampling enabled, and in the client I set the sending interval with setPoolStatisticInterval, but when I open

RE: About operating system statistics

be deleted. On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 6:54 AM Alberto Bustamante Reyes wrote: > Hi all, > > I have read in the documentation that the operating system statistics are > only available for Linux systems, but I have found in the code the > correspondent classes for OSX, Solaris

About operating system statistics

Hi all, I have read in the documentation that the operating system statistics are only available for Linux systems, but I have found in the code the correspondent classes for OSX, Solaris & Windows stats (package org.apache.geode.internal.statistics.platform). Are these classes being used? Sho

Jira & wiki permissions

Hi Geode community, I would like to have permissions to edit the wiki and assign me tickets. Could someone help me with this? My username is alberto.bustamante.reyes Thanks in advance, Alberto