Re: Geode and recovery

2018-10-18 Thread Akihiro Kitada
Hello Yoram, It may be better to post this kind of inquires to u...@geode.apache.org rather than dev@geode.apache.org, but could you provide any log messages with locators vms, for clarifying what was wrong? Thanks, regards. -- Akihiro Kitada | Staff Customer Engineer | +81 80 3716 3736 Sup

Re: [DISCUSS] Standardize use of awaitility to a higher timeout

2018-10-18 Thread Dan Smith
Following up on this thread - I finally got around to getting these changes merged in! A couple of things to note: - If you use regular Awaitility, your code will now fail spotless. Use GeodeAwaitility instead. Now there is no need to set any timeouts, poll delays, etc in your individual tests.

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #1074 was SUCCESSFUL (with 2456 tests)

2018-10-18 Thread Spring CI
--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #1074 was successful. --- Scheduled 2458 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-1074/ -- Thi

Re: Geode Native & Apache Geode 1.8 Release

2018-10-18 Thread Dan Smith
Following up on this - is there anything we still need to do before we cut the 1.8 release branch in 2 weeks? Overall I think the native client source code looks like it's in good shape - we're running rat, the LICENSE and NOTICE look good, no binaries in the source, etc. For cutting the release

Re: [Discuss] showcasing community work

2018-10-18 Thread Sai Boorlagadda
That a great suggestion. I will see if I can add a new page. On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:21 AM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Would it make sense to put these under an "extensions" page, rather than a > "community" page? > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:05 PM Sai Boorlagadda > > wrote: > > > Thanks, Joh

Re: [Discuss] showcasing community work

2018-10-18 Thread Swapnil Bawaskar
Would it make sense to put these under an "extensions" page, rather than a "community" page? On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:05 PM Sai Boorlagadda wrote: > Thanks, John for your inputs. I will be adding the page to capture these > details. > If there are no objections then I would go ahead and add a n