Geode unit tests completed in 'develop/DistributedTest' with non-zero exit code

Pipeline results can be found at: Concourse: https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/develop/jobs/DistributedTest/builds/24

Re: Access to jira to assign and resolve issues...

You should have access now. -Dan On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Mark Hanson wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like access to Jira to assign and resolve issues for Geode. I am > working on this project now and fixing bugs, so access would be useful. > > Thanks, > Mark

Access to jira to assign and resolve issues...

Hi All, I would like access to Jira to assign and resolve issues for Geode. I am working on this project now and fixing bugs, so access would be useful. Thanks, Mark

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #928 was SUCCESSFUL (with 2406 tests)

--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #928 was successful. --- Scheduled 2408 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-928/ -- This

Re: Objections to removing 'upgrade offline-disk-store' command

I know for a fact there are still users who have not upgraded from 7.0.2 yet. Will this be a problem for them? -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Lead Mobile: +1-631-835-4771 Download the GemFire book here.

Objections to removing 'upgrade offline-disk-store' command

The gfsh command 'upgrade offline-disk-store' exists in the code in order to upgrade diskstores from pre-Apache days (GemFire 6.x and 7.x). I don't believe the command is relevant/necessary anymore and, unless there are objections, I'd like to go ahead and remove it. --Jens

Re: PR: Configure Spotless not to join already-wrapped lines

I know that you and I aren't the only ones who disliked how spotless disrupted method chains. Since it won't recognize chain vs non-chain context, we as developers will need to be more cognizant of this in general. But I still think it's a good tradeoff. On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Dale Eme