Re: ExportConfigCommandDUnitTest

2017-10-04 Thread Jared Stewart
That test uses AvailablePortFinder to choose a random available port. It’s possible that you hit a race condition in between the time port was chosen and the time it the server attempted to bind to it. > On Oct 4, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > It passes when I run it in IntelliJ. T

Re: ExportConfigCommandDUnitTest

2017-10-04 Thread Kirk Lund
It passes when I run it in IntelliJ. The cause was: Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use So, I'm assuming the test tried to use a port that was in use. Is the test using a random port or a default port? On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jared Stewart wrote: > I haven’t seen

Re: ExportConfigCommandDUnitTest

2017-10-04 Thread Jared Stewart
I haven’t seen that test fail before. If you rerun the precheckin does it still fail? > On Oct 4, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Kirk Lund wrote: > > ExportConfigCommandDUnitTest failed in my latest precheckin but my changes > don't involve the code this test is testing. Did someone commit break this > te

ExportConfigCommandDUnitTest

2017-10-04 Thread Kirk Lund
ExportConfigCommandDUnitTest failed in my latest precheckin but my changes don't involve the code this test is testing. Did someone commit break this test or is it failing intermittently? Thanks, Kirk :geode-web:distributedTest org.apache.geode.management.internal.cli.commands.ExportConfigComman

[Spring CI] Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #699 was SUCCESSFUL (with 2182 tests)

2017-10-04 Thread Spring CI
--- Spring Data GemFire > Nightly-ApacheGeode > #699 was successful. --- Scheduled 2184 tests in total. https://build.spring.io/browse/SGF-NAG-699/ -- This

Failed: jinmeiliao/geode#24 (exportConfig - bd2fcfe)

2017-10-04 Thread Travis CI
Build Update for jinmeiliao/geode - Build: #24 Status: Failed Duration: 12 minutes and 33 seconds Commit: bd2fcfe (exportConfig) Author: Jinmei Liao Message: GEODE-3567: correctly set the serverPortSetByUser flag View the changeset: https://github.com/jinmeili

Geode at SpringOne Platform conference - expanded agenda for Geode!

2017-10-04 Thread Jagdish Mirani
Hello Geode enthusiasts: I have some good news to share with you. We're working on a solid showing for Geode at our SpringOne Platform conference in December. Not all the sessions have been uploaded to the conference website, but we've created the page and showcased a few of the sessions

Re: [VOTE] C++ standardize on return values only

2017-10-04 Thread Michael William Dodge
+1 for the tuple > On 4 Oct, 2017, at 08:01, Ernest Burghardt wrote: > > +1 Tuple > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:58 AM, David Kimura wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Hitesh Khamesra >> >> wrote: >> >>> Tuple option. >>> >>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android >>> >>> On Tue

Re: [VOTE] C++ standardize on return values only

2017-10-04 Thread Ernest Burghardt
+1 Tuple On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:58 AM, David Kimura wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Hitesh Khamesra > > wrote: > > > Tuple option. > > > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Jacob Barrett > > wrote: Voting on the conversation around C++

Re: [VOTE] C++ standardize on return values only

2017-10-04 Thread David Kimura
+1 On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Hitesh Khamesra wrote: > Tuple option. > > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Jacob Barrett > wrote: Voting on the conversation around C++ return values vs. out > parameters. > This vote is to adopt the standard of return va