Hi David,
Responding to your Slack request about merging Bruce's patch ahead of yours
here so there is more visibility.
That is fine, but as you point out it will mean a temporary loss of test
coverage, as it will disable arm unit testing until either 1. your patch
fixing the flags test hits main
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 1:26 AM Patrick Robb wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 6:33 PM Patrick Robb wrote:
>>
>>
>> For your patch, it looks like there are actually more eal flags test
>> failures:
>> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2023-August/444170.html. In any
>> case, for debugg
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 6:33 PM Patrick Robb wrote:
>
> For your patch, it looks like there are actually more eal flags test
> failures:
> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2023-August/444170.html. In
> any case, for debugging purposes, I will do a run with
> the eal_flags_file_prefix_au
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 3:07 AM David Marchand
wrote:
> It is a "recurring" yet not so well known issue.
> This unit test fails if any part of the DPDK did not release all
> (hugepage backed) memory and associated hugepages before exiting.
>
> In your case here, there is a virtio-net device that
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 9:26 PM David Marchand
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 8:30 PM Patrick Robb wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:40 AM David Marchand
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Patrick, Bruce,
> >>
> >> If it was reported, I either missed it or forgot about it, sorry.
> >> Can you (re)sha
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 3:28 AM David Marchand
wrote:
> It is possible to list tests from meson.
> Why not simply list the existing tests and filter the non working one?
>
> $ meson test -C --suite fast-tests --list
> $ meson test -C --test-args ...
>
> That requires no change in DPDK.
>
>
> T
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 09:27:50AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 8:30 PM Patrick Robb wrote:
> >> Patching sources from the test tool is a poor solution.
> >> In general, developers won't be aware of source patching and will
> >> waste time trying to understand why they ca
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 8:30 PM Patrick Robb wrote:
>> Patching sources from the test tool is a poor solution.
>> In general, developers won't be aware of source patching and will
>> waste time trying to understand why they can't reproduce what the CI
>> reports (it happened to me with DTS on the
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 3:26 PM David Marchand
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 8:30 PM Patrick Robb wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:40 AM David Marchand <
> david.march...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Patrick, Bruce,
> >>
> >> If it was reported, I either missed it or forgot about it, sor
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 8:30 PM Patrick Robb wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:40 AM David Marchand
> wrote:
>>
>> Patrick, Bruce,
>>
>> If it was reported, I either missed it or forgot about it, sorry.
>> Can you (re)share the context?
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Does the test suite pass if the mlx5 driv
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:40 AM David Marchand
wrote:
> Patrick, Bruce,
>
> If it was reported, I either missed it or forgot about it, sorry.
> Can you (re)share the context?
> >
> > Does the test suite pass if the mlx5 driver is disabled in the build?
> That
> > could confirm or refute the su
Patrick, Bruce,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 2:57 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 03:05:08PM -0400, Patrick Robb wrote:
> >Adam from our team just raised something important about this patch and
> >UNH CI which I missed during the RFC discussion.
> >Presently, eal_fl
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 03:05:08PM -0400, Patrick Robb wrote:
>Adam from our team just raised something important about this patch and
>UNH CI which I missed during the RFC discussion.
>Presently, eal_flags_file_prefix_autotest fails on arm tx2 systems (arm
>people are aware of this
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 03:05:08PM -0400, Patrick Robb wrote:
>Adam from our team just raised something important about this patch and
>UNH CI which I missed during the RFC discussion.
>Presently, eal_flags_file_prefix_autotest fails on arm tx2 systems (arm
>people are aware of this
Adam from our team just raised something important about this patch and UNH
CI which I missed during the RFC discussion.
Presently, eal_flags_file_prefix_autotest fails on arm tx2 systems (arm
people are aware of this, they think it might be a memory leak from mlx5
driver), so at their request we a
Rather than using if-else constructs to selectively add or remove files
from the UT build, switch to a table-based approach where each file
lists out what libs or drivers it depends upon.
Initial version of this table was generated via analysis of the header
files included in each C file. The basi
16 matches
Mail list logo
