Hello Ravishankar.
I would like us to migrate to Mina as well, the tracking ticket is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/VFS/issues/VFS-838
I like option 3, more specifically:
Create a new Maven module commons-vfs2-ssh-jsch and move the current
code there, same package, all code is
Hi Gary and Konrad,
I am a new user of VFS (version 2.9.0) and new to open source mailing lists.
I am writing to inquire about the progress on the jsch upgrade/migration.
Do we have any plans of migrating to jsch fork or Apache Mina?
Thank you for your time and assistance.
Thanks,
Ravishankar
and getURI, but might also need some
adjustments:
The comment of RESERVED_URI_CHARS fails to explain why blank is to be escaped:
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/blob/ccf9df52f505fc0c9f7daf29bab6ff0ce1e78286/commons-vfs2/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/vfs2/provider/AbstractFileName.java#L43
Yeah, this needs more research IMO.
One things I am sure of is that a global setting is a no-go for me as it is
bound to cause problems in larger apps that may want conflicting values.
Gary
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025, 12:48 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> I think the encoding caused a lot of confusion wi
I think the encoding caused a lot of confusion with people (and also I dont see
how it is user friendly - besides if the calling Convention required it), but I
dont think we can change that now. So I agree with Review and documenting.
Maybe we need to provide at least a UriParser.decode() publ
Hi all,
We probably need a general review of the API to see if we have an overall
consistency issue RE encoded vs decoded.
I prefer us to be considerate before adding APIs here and there.
We could at least document what is expected for methods that return a
String or consume a String.
I wonder
The Apache Commons VFS Project team is pleased to announce the release
of Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0.
Apache Commons VFS is a Virtual File System library.
This is a feature and maintenance release. Java 8 or later is required.
Historical list of changes:
https://commons.apache.org/proper
TestCase>AbstractProviderTestCase.runTest:293 Weak
> Listener was abandoned expected: but
> was:
>
> However, since each test succeeded at least once and Jsch is planned to
> be removed[1]:
>
> +1, release the artifacts.
>
> Piotr
>
> PS: The Jsch-based tests
ast once and Jsch is planned to
be removed[1]:
+1, release the artifacts.
Piotr
PS: The Jsch-based tests failed due to the contents of my `.ssh`
directory. Probably some key format I use is not supported by the
15-years old library.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Hi Gary,
On 3.02.2025 00:26, Gary Gregory wrote:
Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +0 OK, but...
[ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
The ha
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:09 PM Arnout Engelen wrote:
> * I did not test the artifacts against any project
>
(I have also ran the jackrabbit-vfs-ext unit tests with the staged version
now, no surprises)
Arnout
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 12:27 AM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
>>
I have:
* checked out git tag commons-vfs-2.10.0-RC1 (this needed a --force due to
leftover from previous vote)
* verified it (now) corresponds to 1b94883317d6687e2dd3a0294d9e6e2ab066cf56
* downloaded source zip and tgz
* verified the hashes match
Anthony,
Thank you for the note. Let's review these after the release. We've been
long overdue for this release as it is.
Ty!
Gary
On Tue, Feb 4, 2025, 09:45 Anthony Goubard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here are a few PR/changes that I made to Commons-VFS in case someone
> thinks
Hi,
Here are a few PR/changes that I made to Commons-VFS in case someone
thinks it should be added to the master branch before (or after) the 2.10.0
final release.
First, I've updated my existing pull requests to resolve the conflicts
with the current master branch.
Improved performan
My +1
Gary
On Sun, Feb 2, 2025, 18:26 Gary Gregory wrote:
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> VFS Project 2.9.0 was released over 3 years ago, so I would like to
> release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0.
>
> [Note that try to verify reprod
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
VFS Project 2.9.0 was released over 3 years ago, so I would like to
release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0.
[Note that try to verify reproducibility using artifact:compare:
mvn clean verify artifact:compare -DskipTests
d a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> > Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 was released, so I would like to release
> > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0.
> >
> > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> >https://dist.apache.or
somewhat larger risk of
changing behaviour and breaking existing code, but reduces the risk of
remaining bugs in this area. I tried this out quickly in [1] and the
(fairly extensive) set of unit tests accepts it.
Arnout
[0]: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/396
[1]: https://github.com/apache
Hi All,
PR https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/543/files claims to
resolve 2 issues.
I want feedback from this list, please.
TY!
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands
ow you see it.
> >
> > I can't say if your proposed change has any unintended side-effects; it
> > should be accompanied with some kind of test, at the very least to avoid a
> > regression.
> >
> > TY!
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > On 2024/05
Let me know how you see it.
>
> I can't say if your proposed change has any unintended side-effects; it
> should be accompanied with some kind of test, at the very least to avoid a
> regression.
>
> TY!
> Gary
>
>
> On 2024/05/23 17:08:00 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
e has any unintended side-effects; it should
be accompanied with some kind of test, at the very least to avoid a regression.
TY!
Gary
On 2024/05/23 17:08:00 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am dealing with a heapdump of VFS where I see a lot of WeakRefFileListener
> and a
Hello,
I am dealing with a heapdump of VFS where I see a lot of WeakRefFileListener
and all of them have a empty WeakRef to no listener. While I think I found the
reason for that and fixed it on a dependent project, it still does not clean
up correctly. I think the reason is that it does not
I have a release candidate out but some files are missing, so there is
something off in the build process.
It's been on my to-do list, so within a week or two I hope.
Gary
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 7:19 AM Elric V wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Any chance of getting a new VFS relea
Hi folks,
Any chance of getting a new VFS release soonish? There have been a lot
of dependency updates, which would make vulnerability scanners a lot
less trigger happy. 2.9.0 was released in 2021, so a 2.9.1 might not be
a bad idea.
Am willing to help out with this if possible.
Best
+1
> On Mar 10, 2024, at 6:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
> Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 was released, so I would like to release
> Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0.
>
> Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0
st}
>
>
> I think that's fine and it's just probably something missing somewhere to
> configure the commons-release-plugin or parent to output the sha here.
>
> But then I decided to take a better look at the archives just to be sure.
>
> Are the bin files for VFS alwa
ewhere to
configure the commons-release-plugin or parent to output the sha here.
But then I decided to take a better look at the archives just to be sure.
Are the bin files for VFS always nearly empty, with just three files?
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.10.0-RC1/binaries/
We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache
Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 was released, so I would like to release
Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0.
Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.10.0
:
>
> [INFO] --- assembly:3.6.0:single (binary) @ commons-vfs2-distribution ---
> [INFO] Reading assembly descriptor: src/assembly/bin.xml
> [INFO]
> ----
> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.
sembly/bin.xml
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Commons VFS Project 2.10.0-SNAPSHOT:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Commons VFS Project . SUCCESS [02:31 min]
[INFO] Apache Commons VFS . SUCCE
Hi All and Rob:
To build a local test VFS release candidate, or any multi-module
project, I normally do this:
mvn -V -Ptest-deploy -Prelease clean install
mvn -V -Ptest-deploy -Prelease -P japicmp -P jacoco site
mvn -V -Ptest-deploy -Prelease deploy
then more stuff but this 3rd step fails with
The best bet is probably to switch to Apache Mina, another item on my todo
list, unless we get a PR on GitHub first ;-)
Gary
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023, 7:36 AM Konrad Samburski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The latest version (2.9.0) of VFS is using com.jcraft.jsch for sftp.
> Unfortunately it s
Hello,
The latest version (2.9.0) of VFS is using com.jcraft.jsch for sftp.
Unfortunately it seems jsch is not maintained any more therefore it does
not support the new OPENSSH format of private key.
Are you planning to switch to jsch fork com.github.mwiede which supports
new formats?
I see
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:57 PM Mark Fortner wrote:
>
> I was looking at the VFS code recently and had a few questions:
>
>- There's a *plugins.xml* file that each of the plugins needs to
>register themselves with. I was wondering if there was a reason that the
I was looking at the VFS code recently and had a few questions:
- There's a *plugins.xml* file that each of the plugins needs to
register themselves with. I was wondering if there was a reason that the
*ServiceLoader* wasn't used for this? It would seem like a natural fit.
-
1:51 PM Woonsan Ko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While I was preparing a PR, I got test failures below after running
> `mvn` in the master branch of the commons-vfs.
> Any hints for this? (I'm with maven-3.9.2 on JDK 1.8 / windows 10.)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Woonsan
>
> -
>
Hi,
While I was preparing a PR, I got test failures below after running
`mvn` in the master branch of the commons-vfs.
Any hints for this? (I'm with maven-3.9.2 on JDK 1.8 / windows 10.)
Thanks!
Woonsan
-
[ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time
elapsed: 0.
with connection
>> algorithms, etc but there's now at least support to add algorithms to the
>> list of existing ones in 3 ways (though not sure how VFS might support
>> this
>> currently).
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 6:58 AM Gary
e new fork of jsch -
> https://github.com/mwiede/jsch, there's a few issues with connection
> algorithms, etc but there's now at least support to add algorithms to the
> list of existing ones in 3 ways (though not sure how VFS might support this
> currently).
>
> David
The other option would be to migrate to the new fork of jsch -
https://github.com/mwiede/jsch, there's a few issues with connection
algorithms, etc but there's now at least support to add algorithms to the
list of existing ones in 3 ways (though not sure how VFS might support this
Hi all,
It seems that Jsch is unmaintained.
I propose we port to Apache Mina, which has an active and experienced
community.
It this easy or hard? A large or small task? Thoughts?
Help wanted ;-) PR welcome :-)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-838
TY!
Gary
I approved the 2 GitHub workflows.
Gary
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022, 13:51 John Patrick wrote:
> Evening,
>
> Could someone approve my PR's workflow as still 1st time contributor for
> vfs. If they pass they are read for review and potential merge.
>
> Upgrades all the easy te
Evening,
Could someone approve my PR's workflow as still 1st time contributor for
vfs. If they pass they are read for review and potential merge.
Upgrades all the easy tests to JUnit v5
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/240
Extracts test methods out of AbstractVfsTestCase, and
ftpserver updated.
pr at https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/235
details/investigations at https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/231
Xeno Amess 于2022年1月1日周六 02:12写道：
> migrating sshd to 2.8.0 now.
>
> Gary Gregory 于2022年1月1日周六 02:04写道：
>
>> Hi Xeno,
>>
migrating sshd to 2.8.0 now.
Gary Gregory 于2022年1月1日周六 02:04写道：
> Hi Xeno,
>
> Correct, I don't care about slf4j in this thread. Thank you for helping out
> :-)
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, 12:52 Xeno Amess wrote:
>
> > > Help also needed fo
Hi Xeno,
Correct, I don't care about slf4j in this thread. Thank you for helping out
:-)
Gary
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021, 12:52 Xeno Amess wrote:
> > Help also needed for https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/225
>
> I thought you wanna talk about all dependabot failures i
> Help also needed for https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/225
I thought you wanna talk about all dependabot failures in vfs in the same
thread.
So this email thread is only focused on sshd and ftpserver?
Gary Gregory 于2022年1月1日周六 01:47写道：
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:16 PM Xeno
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:16 PM Xeno Amess wrote:
> @Gary Gregory
> well at least you can have this from me
> https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/233
> seems it can work, but don't merge until all cis are done.
>
Let's keep this email thread focused please.
Gar
;>> any reason pr's have to be manually approved before the ci jobs
> execute?
> >>>
> >>> John
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 13:50, Xeno Amess wrote:
> >>>
> >>> &
@Rob Spoor
I will have a try to upgrade it directly to 2.8.0
good luck to me...
Xeno Amess 于2022年1月1日周六 01:15写道：
> @Gary Gregory
> well at least you can have this from me
> https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/233
> seems it can work, but don't merge until all cis are do
@Gary Gregory
well at least you can have this from me
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/233
seems it can work, but don't merge until all cis are done.
Rob Spoor 于2022年1月1日周六 01:10写道：
> A quick check shows that some more dependencies are needed, for code
> split off from s
hinking
the upgrade from 0.x to 1.x is bigger than the upgrade from 1.x to 2.x
(don't get me started on 0.x to 2.x).
Rob
On 31/12/2021 17:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
Help also needed for https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/225
:-)
Gary
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 8:28 AM Gary Gregory
> created new branch but it linked to previous commit, so added and
> remove
> >>> a
> >>> file to trick github to try and do a new build again.
> >>> any reason pr's have to be manually approved before the ci jobs
> execute?
> >>>
> >&
;> any reason pr's have to be manually approved before the ci jobs execute?
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 31 Dec 2021 at 13:50, Xeno Amess wrote:
>>>
>>> > need sleep now，will have a look 10 hours later
>>> >
>>> > XenoAmess
>>> &g
31 Dec 2021 at 13:50, Xeno Amess wrote:
>>
>> > need sleep now，will have a look 10 hours later
>> >
>> > XenoAmess
>> >
>> > From: Gary Gregory
>> > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2021 9:28:36 PM
>
hours later
> >
> > XenoAmess
> >
> > From: Gary Gregory
> > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2021 9:28:36 PM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2
&
t; >
> > From: Gary Gregory
> > Sent: Friday, December 31, 2021 9:28:36 PM
> > To: Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2
> >
> > Does anyone have any free time to
Help also needed for https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/225
:-)
Gary
On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 8:28 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> Does anyone have any free time to look at this failure?
>
> I'm still dealing with Log4j fallout...
>
> Gary
>
> -- Forwarde
ater
>
> XenoAmess
>
> From: Gary Gregory
> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2021 9:28:36 PM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2
>
> Does anyone have any free time to look at this fail
need sleep now，will have a look 10 hours later
XenoAmess
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2021 9:28:36 PM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [commons-vfs] Failure in bump ftpserver-core from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2
Does anyone have any free time to look
Does anyone have any free time to look at this failure?
I'm still dealing with Log4j fallout...
Gary
-- Forwarded message -
From: GitBox
Date: Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 6:05 AM
Subject: [GitHub] [commons-vfs] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request
#231: Bump ftpserver-core
The Apache Commons VFS Project team is pleased to announce the release
of Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0.
Apache Commons VFS is a Virtual File System library.
Maintenance release. Requires Java 8.
Changes in this version include:
Fixed Bugs:
o Add and use
> > We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> > VFS Project 2.8.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> > Commons VFS Project 2.9.0.
> >
> > Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 RC1 is available for review here:
> > https
My +!
Gary
On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 8:16 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
> VFS Project 2.8.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
> Commons VFS Project 2.9.0.
>
> Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 RC
then. So, it exists on the current live
>> site):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.9.0-RC1/site/commons-vfs2/rat-report.html
>> <
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.9.0-RC1/site/commons-vfs2/rat-report.html
>>>
>>
>> **
ote this file was originally committed in August of 2019,
> and we have done releases since then. So, it exists on the current live
> site):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.9.0-RC1/site/commons-vfs2/rat-report.html
> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev
://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.9.0-RC1/site/commons-vfs2/rat-report.html
<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.9.0-RC1/site/commons-vfs2/rat-report.html>
*
Summary
---
Generated at: 2021-07-16T23:41:42
generation.
Thanks!
Bruno
On Sunday, 18 July 2021, 12:16:27 am NZST, Gary Gregory
wrote:
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
VFS Project 2.8.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons VFS Project 2.9.0.
Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 RC1
We have fixed a few bugs and added enhancements since Apache Commons
VFS Project 2.8.0 was released, so I would like to release Apache
Commons VFS Project 2.9.0.
Apache Commons VFS Project 2.9.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/vfs/2.9.0-RC1
@commons.apache.org ; Benjamin Marwell
Betreff: Re: [VFS] unexpected 'relative path' in verify.groovy
Okay,
the exact error message is:
Could not find file with URI
"tar:file:home/user/git/apache/vfs-invoker-groovy/target/it/vfs-it/target/dependency/vfs-invoker-groovy-1.0
Okay,
the exact error message is:
Could not find file with URI
"tar:file:home/user/git/apache/vfs-invoker-groovy/target/it/vfs-it/target/dependency/vfs-invoker-groovy-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.tar!/hello.txt"
because it is a relative path, and no base URI was provided.
In fact, adding common
.
Ben
Am Sa., 24. Apr. 2021 um 23:22 Uhr schrieb Benjamin Marwell
:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I tried to use vfs2 in a verify.groovy script like this:
>
> def fsManager = VFS.manager
> def file =
> fsManager.resolveFile("gz:tar:${basedir}/target/dependencies/vfs-invo
Hi everyone,
I tried to use vfs2 in a verify.groovy script like this:
def fsManager = VFS.manager
def file =
fsManager.resolveFile("gz:tar:${basedir}/target/dependencies/vfs-invoker-groovy-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.tar!/hello.txt")
While this works in a junit+groovy maven test case, it
sorry wrong link ('example' on the api page) is not working
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-vfs/apidocs/org/apache/commons/vfs2/example/package-summary.html
Jens
Am 02.04.21 um 02:33 schrieb Gary Gregory:
For me, on my phone, that link just goes to where it is suppose
For me, on my phone, that link just goes to where it is supposed to
https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-vfs/api.html
Gary
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021, 19:48 Jens Kapitza
wrote:
> Hi, is this a bug?
>
> Call: https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-vfs/api.html
>
> i get: The re
Hi, is this a bug?
Call: https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-vfs/api.html
i get: The requested URL was not found on this server.
Thanks Jens Kapitza
code
>>> did not use synchronize, so it would be good to not change it to do so
>>> (especially not if that’s not needed for the change in question!).
>>>
>>> I did not follow the changes completely, so I am not sure what’s
>>> proposed. Can we we
Hi all,
I will look for some low hanging fruits but I plan on cutting a release
candidate for VFS 2.8.1 quite soon.
Please review what is in git master, Jira, and GitHub PRs...
Gary
private static final String REL_PATH_GREAT =
> "src/test/resources/test-data/好.txt";
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
>
> --
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
> Von: ggreg...@apache.org
> Gesendet: Sonntag, März 28, 2021 11:31 PM
> An: comm...
String REL_PATH_GREAT =
> "src/test/resources/test-data/好.txt";
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
Von: ggreg...@apache.org
Gesendet: Sonntag, März 28, 2021 11:31 PM
An: comm...@commons.apache.org
Betreff: [commons-vfs] branch master updated: Illeg
So I think that I will cut a release candidate for 2.8.1 soon unless
someone can take a look at this or the other issue that could delay the RC:
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/168
Gary
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021, 10:30 Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> That is what I used, but it creates
That is what I used, but it creates an notification email per edit.
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
Von: Gary Gregory
Gesendet: Sunday, March 14, 2021 4:52:18 AM
An: Commons Developers List
Betreff: Re: [VFS] Help with FileContent implementation
On
"Edit". You?
Gary
>
>
> --
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
> Von: Gary Gregory
> Gesendet: Friday, March 12, 2021 10:58:00 PM
> An: Commons Developers List
> Betreff: [VFS] Help with FileContent implementation
>
> Hi All
List
Betreff: [VFS] Help with FileContent implementation
Hi All:
I'm looking for help and see if this strikes anything in anyone's
memory; please see my comment and the PR:
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/166#issuecomment-79888
Hi All:
I'm looking for help and see if this strikes anything in anyone's
memory; please see my comment and the PR:
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/166#issuecomment-79888
TY!
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e
My +1
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 9:59 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Hi All:
> >
> > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> > since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 was released, so I would like
> > to release
My +1
Gary
On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 9:59 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 was released, so I would like
> to release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0.
>
0, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime:
> > /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64
> > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> > OS name: "linux", version: "5.4.0-66-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> Thanks!
> Bruno
>
>
>
>On Sunday, 7 March 2021, 3:59:56 pm NZDT, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> Hi All:
>
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 was released, so I would like
>
rch: "amd64", family: "unix"
Thanks!
Bruno
On Sunday, 7 March 2021, 3:59:56 pm NZDT, Gary Gregory
wrote:
Hi All:
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 was released, so I would like
to release A
Hi All:
We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
since Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0 was released, so I would like
to release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0.
Apache Commons VFS Project 2.8.0 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos
Can we we maybe squash it at minimize the changes to fix the
>> actual Bug (if there is one, since I think we still have no specification
>> on concurrency and locking properties of VFS) and keep them Loom support
>> discussion separate from the release?
>>
>> Gruss
&
am not sure what’s proposed.
> Can we we maybe squash it at minimize the changes to fix the actual Bug (if
> there is one, since I think we still have no specification on concurrency
> and locking properties of VFS) and keep them Loom support discussion
> separate from the release
it at minimize the changes to fix the actual Bug (if there
is one, since I think we still have no specification on concurrency and locking
properties of VFS) and keep them Loom support discussion separate from the
release?
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
I want to move the discussion from the PR to this mailing list,
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154
TY,
Gary
https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154
Can anyone help validate this PR? An actual unit test seems elusive.
Gary
the solution to download huge file (which may
> cost more then 20min) with two parameter, such as:
> ftpClient.setControlKeepAliveReplyTimeout(5000);
>
> ftpClient.setControlKeepAliveTimeout(15);
>
>
> I hope the VFS can also support them.
FTPClient has the solution to download huge file (which may cost
more then 20min) with two parameter, such as:
ftpClient.setControlKeepAliveReplyTimeout(5000);
ftpClient.setControlKeepAliveTimeout(15);
I hope the VFS can also support them.
ed all of them in master?
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
>
>
> --
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
> Von: Gary Gregory
> Gesendet: Saturday, October 31, 2020 6:57:21 PM
> An: Commons Developers List
> Betreff: Re: JIRA fixe
1 - 100 of 2230 matches
Mail list logo
