ay, October 11, 2010 19:42
>>> To: Commons Developers List
>>> Subject: Re: Weird class names [WAS RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based
>>> on
>>> RC3]
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Gary Gregory
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi
class names [WAS RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based
>> on
>> RC3]
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > The more I think about it and read it, the more non-English and odd the
>> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: mfncoo...@gmail.com [mailto:mfncoo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Martin
> Cooper
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 19:42
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: Weird class names [WAS RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on
> RC3]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jodastep...@gmail.com [mailto:jodastep...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Stephen Colebourne
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 17:09
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: Weird class names [WAS RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 16:30
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: Weird class names [WAS RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on
> RC3]
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010
pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 05:11
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC3
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>> I am looking around and I notice set of class names that are IMO incorre
On 12 October 2010 00:29, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> Part of me thinks its a bit late in the day to raise this when its
> been in svn for 2+ years. But then again, if more people agree with
> Gary then I can cancel the release and rename them (I would probably
> opt for FileItem, FileObserver, FileM
They do say "often also written as filesystem"
>> but so what? Wikipedia says a lot of things...
>>
>> I am kinda ranting on this one because I think names are very important.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Niall Pemb
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 05:11
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC3
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>> I am looking arou
es [WAS RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC3]
Hi All:
The more I think about it and read it, the more non-English and odd the word
"filesystem" feels to me. I would never write: 'Do this or that with the
filesystem.' It just sounds Dutch or German to me. That's
kinda ranting on this one because I think names are very important.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 05:11
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC3
On Mon, Oct 11, 2
ommons.apache.org/jci/apidocs/index.html
Niall
> Gary Gregory
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 21:31
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on
. USA
Tel: +1.404.760.1560 . Mobile: +1.310.403.8747
Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 21:31
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Comm
Apologies, this vote is cancelled.
I'll roll another RC to fix the issue Gary found in the Ant build.
Niall
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC3. The main changes since RC2 are
> improvements to some tests which were causing intermittent f
ll Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 21:31
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC3
>
> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC3. The main changes since RC2 are
> improvements to some tests which were cau
Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2010 21:31
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC3
I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC3. The main changes since RC2 are
improvements to some tests which were causing intermittent failures in
Gump &
I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC3. The main changes since RC2 are
improvements to some tests which were causing intermittent failures in
Gump & Continuum and JavaDoc improvements. For details about Continuum
builds/failures, see:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0/IOFailures.html
The dist
17 matches
Mail list logo
