On 12 October 2010 00:29, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > Part of me thinks its a bit late in the day to raise this when its > been in svn for 2+ years. But then again, if more people agree with > Gary then I can cancel the release and rename them (I would probably > opt for FileItem, FileObserver, FileMonitor rather than > FileSystemItem, FileSystemObserver, FileSystemMonitor).
I strongly recommend renaming in line with the JDK - http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/javadoc/index.html (assuming the classes are unreleased ATM) I do agree that it is unfortunate to have an issue at this point. I would be happy with the shorter (non system) names too. Stephen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
