Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: primitives)

2009-12-03 Thread Phil Steitz
Benson Margulies wrote: > Thanks. Can you point me to a page describing where the sandy area is in svn? http://commons.apache.org/svninfo.html Phil > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Benson Margulies wrote: >>> Oh, oops, sorry about the one more message on the old thread.

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: primitives)

2009-12-03 Thread Benson Margulies
Thanks. Can you point me to a page describing where the sandy area is in svn? On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Benson Margulies wrote: >> Oh, oops, sorry about the one more message on the old thread. >> >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rahul Akolkar >> wrote: >>> Pretty su

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: primitives)

2009-12-03 Thread Phil Steitz
Benson Margulies wrote: > Oh, oops, sorry about the one more message on the old thread. > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> Pretty sure it will when psteitz sees it, but changing subject here >> for better visibility. >> >> Sandbox karma requested by bimargulies. Done. W

Re: [JEXL] Best way to generate 2 jars ?

2009-12-03 Thread henrib
Rahul Akolkar wrote: > > > And if by optionality of jexl-compat you meant not building it every > time, we could use profile activation so the compat module only gets > built if a -Pcompat switch is provided, for example. > > -Rahul > > I'm still trying to find the best solution to ease th

Re: Sandbox karma request (was Re: primitives)

2009-12-03 Thread Benson Margulies
Oh, oops, sorry about the one more message on the old thread. On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > Pretty sure it will when psteitz sees it, but changing subject here > for better visibility. > > Sandbox karma requested by bimargulies. > > -Rahul > > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:

Re: primitives

2009-12-03 Thread Benson Margulies
Yes, thank you, can I please have the karma :-) On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Or you could start up a sandbox project. We've had good success with >> ASF committers creating a sandbox branch of a released componen

Re: [JEXL 2.0] o.a.c.jexl or o.a.c.jexl2 ?

2009-12-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Niall Pemberton >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:25 PM, henrib wrote: One last thing, just to be safe; if I was to perform

Sandbox karma request (was Re: primitives)

2009-12-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Pretty sure it will when psteitz sees it, but changing subject here for better visibility. Sandbox karma requested by bimargulies. -Rahul On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Did my email register as a request for sandbox karma? > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Henri

Re: primitives

2009-12-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Or you could start up a sandbox project. We've had good success with > ASF committers creating a sandbox branch of a released component, and > after diving in for a while it's then merged in to trunk where they > then become one of the most

Re: [JEXL] Best way to generate 2 jars ?

2009-12-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:32 PM, henrib wrote: > > Just the kind of examples I was searching for, thanks. > And if by optionality of jexl-compat you meant not building it every time, we could use profile activation so the compat module only gets built if a -Pcompat switch is provided, for example

Re: [JEXL] JexlContext API changes in JEXL-92 (was: svn commit: r884650 [1/2] ...)

2009-12-03 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:51 PM, henrib wrote: > > Repaired damage through revision 885553. > Hope this suits better. > Yup, thanks. -Rahul > > Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> >> I have three comments plus two nits below (search for strings >> "Comment" and "Nit"): >> ... >> > ---

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-12-03 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-12-03 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [JEXL 2.0] o.a.c.jexl or o.a.c.jexl2 ?

2009-12-03 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:25 PM, henrib wrote: >>> >>> >>> One last thing, just to be safe; if I was to perform the serie of 'svn >>> mv...' on the java files in the trunk, anyt