Benson Margulies wrote: > Oh, oops, sorry about the one more message on the old thread. > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Rahul Akolkar <rahul.akol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Pretty sure it will when psteitz sees it, but changing subject here >> for better visibility. >> >> Sandbox karma requested by bimargulies.
Done. Welcome! Phil >> >> -Rahul >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Did my email register as a request for sandbox karma? >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Or you could start up a sandbox project. We've had good success with >>>> ASF committers creating a sandbox branch of a released component, and >>>> after diving in for a while it's then merged in to trunk where they >>>> then become one of the most active coders of that component. >>>> >>>> So +1 to a sandbox branch to primitives if you have ideas you'd like >>>> to play with. ASF committers get karma to the sandbox on request, so >>>> just need you to want to do that and we can add karma. >>>> >>>> Hen >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Stephen, >>>>> >>>>> It's interesting to me that the world in general knows about Trove, >>>>> but not so much this. >>>>> >>>>> The fact that the front page is labelled with a snapshot version might >>>>> have something to do with it, but I am kind of mystified. One thing >>>>> that I'd like to add that Trove has is a full generic object hash map >>>>> that is an open hash to avoid the space bloat of the stock Java >>>>> HashMap. >>>>> >>>>> I am willing to make time to work on this. Since I'm not a committer >>>>> at commons, I'm thinking that my proposed lab is a reasonable place to >>>>> put in some effort and then bring it back into commons. Or maybe I >>>>> should just start teeing up patches at commons? I find that >>>>> reorganizing changes that might be called for to do generics and such >>>>> are really clumsy in patches, so svn cp-ing to a lab might still make >>>>> sense. >>>>> >>>>> I'm copy the labs list to test if I'm making a particle of sense. >>>>> >>>>> --benson >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Stephen Colebourne >>>>> <scolebou...@btopenworld.com> wrote: >>>>>> Benson Margulies wrote: >>>>>>> I proposed a lab over at labs in which to start construction of >>>>>>> something much like what commons-primitives describes itself as >>>>>>> setting out to do. The web page for primitives suggests a rather >>>>>>> dormant state. Is there anybody in there actively working on >>>>>>> primitives? >>>>>> I think [primitives] is stable and complete, thus appears rather quiet. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd also point out Joda-Primitives - >>>>>> http://joda-primitives.sourceforge.net/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Its a fork of the concept of [primitives] but with an API design I felt >>>>>> more >>>>>> comfortable with. However, I don't have time to work on it (generify, >>>>>> release). I'll grant access to anyone that wants to help on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Stephen >>>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
