Hi,
I'd to discuss if/when we should be using Avro or any serialization tool in
the Cassandra core.
Some context: We have begun the process of removing Avro from the service
layer CASSANDRA-926. We currently use Avro for schema migrations internally,
and we have two open items that are using Avro
+1
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> CASSANDRA-2058[1] is serious enough to warrant a new 0.6 point release.
> I propose the following for release as 0.6.11.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.6@r1064231
> 0.6.11 artifacts: http://peop
Can you show us sstable listing names? should be *-f-Data.db
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Dan Hendry wrote:
> Upgraded one node to 0.7. Its logging exceptions like mad (thousands per
> minute). All like below (which is fairly new to me):
>
> ERROR [ReadStage:721] 2011-02-10 18:13:56,190 Abstr
+1
I'm also concerned with our lack of regression testing. A lot of this is
done by individual committers firing up EC2 clusters and running basic
sanity checks and workloads. Most of the bugs we are finding pop up under
heavy load.
It would be great if the community could identify and contribu
+1
Seeing some impressive performance improvements in my use case.
-Jake
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> Tested reading 0.7.0 commitlog and data files and compacting to new
> bloom filter format.
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> >
> >
+1
On Feb 15, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> CASSANDRA-2165[1] is troublesome enough to warrant a new release. I
> propose the following for 0.7.2.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.7.2@r1071063
> 0.7.2 artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~
+1
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> >
> > Here goes attempt #2 of 0.7.3 (see http://goo.gl/Y1l7n for background);
> > I propose the following for release as 0.7.3.
> >
> > SVN:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org
All commands in the cli must end with a ;
On Mar 5, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Santiago Basulto wrote:
> Hello people, i'm starting with Cassandra. I've been playing around with it.
>
> I've read the getting started guide and the wiki, but i'm having a little
> problem.
>
> The cassandra server, in
+1
On Mar 14, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
>>
>> It's that time again. I propose the following for release as 0.7.4.
>> What say you?
>>
>> SVN:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.
I for one still like YesQL
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> Everybody is right. The CQL<->SQL naming ambiguity is a problem. We
> need to do something about this before it gets out of hand.
>
> I've been thinking about alternatives all weekend. Here's one thing I
> came
+1
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> I propose the following artifacts for release as 0.6.13.
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.6@r1091922
> Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~eevans
>
> The will remain open for 72 hours, (longer if
Does this mean 0.6.1 isn't going to work for 0.8 maven deps?
I need to know because I'll upgrade the version in the source if we are
going to depend on it.
-Jake
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> yep will be so doing, but those poms ha
+1
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
> > Release 0.7.6 shipped with a bug in the debian packaging that prevent the
> > package from being correctly set up (CASSANDRA-2481). Since the debian
> > packaging
+1
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> OK, let's try this yet again; I propose the following artifacts for release
> as 0.8.0 (final).
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.8.0@r1129278
> Artifacts:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/rep
Hi Joe,
JIRA and IRC. also see http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/HowToContribute
-Jake
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Joseph Stein wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2495
>
> Is anyone working on this? If so can I help? If not would then I would
> like
> to contribute!
0.8 uses thrift 0.6
On Jul 2, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Joseph Stein wrote:
> So I am working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2833
>
> And when I generate the cassandra.thrift file I am getting weird results and
> differences
>
> Should I be modifying the CounterColumn.java by h
-1 due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3076
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> While Sylvain is sunning himself on a beach somewhere[3], I propose
> the following for release as 0.7.9[4].
>
> SVN:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandr
, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> > -1 due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3076
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> >
> >> While Sylvain is sunning himself on a beach somewhere[3], I propose
> >>
I agree that apache extras makes better sense sense it's Branded (tm) and
has git.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Robert Jackson
> wrote:
> > On Aug 29, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> >> If so, is it Apache Extras or Github (eithe
How do you make it show up?
It's eclipse-files
On Sep 7, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
> I think it's 'ant generate-eclipse-files'? Maybe we should make it show up?
Oh you are right.
generate-eclipse-files
On Sep 7, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Jason Rutherglen wrote:
> I think it's 'ant generate-eclipse-files'? Maybe we should make it show up?
+1
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) on the pom.xml's from me
>
> -Stephen
>
> On 14 September 2011 16:56, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> > It's been a week since the freeze and we don't have too many open tickets
> for
> >
You need that to work with the OPP since it checks that the string is UTF-8
Valid.
If you are using RP or BOP no need.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Ruby Stevenson wrote:
> btw - the original code is in brisk repo:
>
>
> https://github.com/riptano/brisk/blob/master/src/java/src/org/apache/c
+1
On Oct 8, 2011, at 7:39 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> We've all been waiting for it. Apache Cassandra 1.0 is getting real folks.
> All (known) blocking issues have been resolved and October 8th is there, I see
> no reason to delay this any longer. I propose the following artifacts for
> re
+1
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> As said while closing previous vote, CASSANDRA-3338 felt important enough
> to
> warrant a reroll. So here it is: I propose the following artifacts for
> release
> as 1.0.0 (those are the same as the previous + the patch for CASSANDRA
+1
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
> > Let's hope third times will be the charm. With #3343, #3345 and #3346 in,
> I
> > propose the following artifacts for release as 1.0.0.
> >
> > SVN:
> https://svn.apach
+1
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> I know 1.0.1 was just released like a week ago, but we've fixed
> CASSANDRA-3427
> which is pretty bad. And it's not even the only thing we've fixed, so it
> sounds reasonable to release 1.0.2 now (and hope it lasts longer than
> 1.0.1)
Having worked at places where you get fired if software *attempts* to
contact outside world I understand the concerns.
However, if it's opt-in via config file and requires a restart then there
is no reason why it should be a concern.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:29 AM, Zhu Han wrote:
> On Wed, No
+1
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> So, 1.0.3 was not as solid as one would have hoped and CASSANDRA-3510 is
> fairly bad. We've also fixed a few concurrency bugs and more, so it is
> worth
> pushing all this to the use now. I thus propose the following artifacts for
> r
+1
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
> > So 1.0.4 was actually pretty catastrophic. CASSANDRA-3540 is a clear
> blocker
> > and CASSANDRA-3539 is critical too. For now, we've pulled the plug on
> 1.0.4 by
> > removin
Hi Stephen,
See
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-infrastructure-dev/201112.mbox/%3ca603ffce-623b-43e9-87f8-39baa51c7...@gbiv.com%3E
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> just the question, where do us contributors who are not co
Not to mention in the case of CFS we deal only in binary blobs.
I'd rather see us add a hex hack for JS and PHP rather then cater to them.
-Jake
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> I think CQL has a problem, it doesn't deal with binary correctly.
> I have very successful
Is there a reason you would prefer a JSONType over CASSANDRA-3647? It
would seem the only thing a JSON type offers you is validation. 3647 takes
it much further by deconstructing a JSON document using composite columns
to flatten the document out, with the ability to access and update portions
of
+1
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 8:37 AM J. D. Jordan wrote:
>
> +1 (nb)
>
> > On Feb 6, 2025, at 6:31 AM, Maxim Muzafarov wrote:
> >
> > +1 (nb)
> >
> >> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 05:34, Patrick McFadin wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 8:15 PM C. Scott Andreas
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>
This is very cool!
I have done a POC that was similar but more akin to Aurora paper
whereby the commitlog itself would repair itself from peers
proactively using the seekable commitlog.
Can you explain the reason you prefer to reconcile on read? Having a
consistent commitlog would solve so many
301 - 335 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
