>> - It looks like there might be compiled code in the release? [1][2]
Non issue. Test resources.
>> - LICENSE is missing some 3rd party code license information [5] This
>> contains code "Copyright DataStax, Inc." under ALv2, python-smhasher under
>> MIT, OrderedDict under MIT (copyright Ray
Yes, my understanding is that the number is not itself copyrightable. We simply
attribute in the source code as a courtesy and for future readers.
If you are concerned we can loop in legal.
> On 30 Aug 2023, at 12:29, Mick Semb Wever wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> - It looks like there might be compiled
Thank you for your work and the prompt update, Maxim!
We seem to have a lazy consensus here so I suggest we continue all
operational discussions on the tickets themselves (not only the mentioned
ones but also any other dependency management tickets that might be open).
My understanding is that peo
Hi,
> >> - It looks like there might be compiled code in the release? [1][2]
> Non issue. Test resources.
Test resources are not exempt - see [1]
> >> - Files are missing ASF headers [3][4][6][7][8] are these 3rd party files?
>
> Non issue. Doc files, or third-party files.
> Dockerfiles fixed i
https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 at 00:01, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > >> - It looks like there might be compiled code in the release? [1][2]
> > Non issue. Test resources.
>
> Test resources are not exempt - see [1]
>
> > >> - Files are mi
These are not compiled code. They are serialized dumps of bloom filter data.
> On Aug 28, 2023, at 9:58 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> 1../test/data/serialization/3.0/utils.BloomFilter1000.bin
> 2. ./test/data/serialization/4.0/utils.BloomFilter1000.bin
