+1.
Also I think it is time for creating cassandra-2.0 branching.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> We've cleaned out everything tagged for rc1, anything else we need to
> do before rolling it up for a vote?
>
> --
> Jonathan Ellis
> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
> co-foun
Sounds like it's that time; I propose the following artifacts for
release as 2.0.0 rc1.
Git: 2.0.0-rc1-tentative / e8ae672
Gitweb:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=commit;h=e8ae672
Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-062/org/
+1
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Sounds like it's that time; I propose the following artifacts for
> release as 2.0.0 rc1.
>
> Git: 2.0.0-rc1-tentative / e8ae672
> Gitweb:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=commit;h=e8ae672
> Artifacts:
> https:
+1
On Monday, August 5, 2013, Carl Yeksigian wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
>>
>> Sounds like it's that time; I propose the following artifacts for
>> release as 2.0.0 rc1.
>>
>> Git: 2.0.0-rc1-tentative / e8ae672
>> Gitweb:
>>
https://git-wip-us.apache.or
+1
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Sounds like it's that time; I propose the following artifacts for
> release as 2.0.0 rc1.
>
> Git: 2.0.0-rc1-tentative / e8ae672
> Gitweb:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=commit;h=e8ae672
> Artifacts:
> https:
+1
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Murali wrote:
> +1
>
> On Monday, August 5, 2013, Carl Yeksigian wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Sounds like it's that time; I propose the following artifacts for
> >> release as 2.0.0 rc1.
> >>
> >
+1
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Sounds like it's that time; I propose the following artifacts for
> release as 2.0.0 rc1.
>
> Git: 2.0.0-rc1-tentative / e8ae672
> Gitweb:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=commit;h=e8ae672
> Artifacts:
> https:
Hi,
I need a client in C (not C++) to work with Cassandra, so since there
is no one yet I would do my own. So far I have checked, I can do it
through Thrift RPC port, or through CQL port. As I understand, CQL
doesn't support direct "mutate" or "get_range_slices" calls like
Thrift does , so being Th
You want to use CQL. Push notifications of cluster changes alone are worth it.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Nulik Nol wrote:
> Hi,
> I need a client in C (not C++) to work with Cassandra, so since there
> is no one yet I would do my own. So far I have checked, I can do it
> through Thrift RPC
Reminder: this means that fixes for 2.0.0 need to go into the 2.0.0,
2.0, and trunk branches. When 2.0.0 is released the branch will be
retired.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Sounds like it's that time; I propose the following artifacts for
> release as 2.0.0 rc1.
>
> Gi
+1
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Sounds like it's that time; I propose the following artifacts for
> release as 2.0.0 rc1.
>
> Git: 2.0.0-rc1-tentative / e8ae672
> Gitweb:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=commit;h=e8ae672
> Artifacts:
> https:/
I'd recommend Thrift.
> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 14:08:52 -0500
> Subject: CQL or Thrift ?
> From: nulik...@gmail.com
> To: dev@cassandra.apache.org
>
> Hi,
> I need a client in C (not C++) to work with Cassandra, so since there
> is no one yet I would do my own. So far I have checked, I can do it
Why? Please give me 3 reasons why this is good advice to the OP.
The frame based binary protocol will be 100% easier to implement in C than
the never-been-out-of-alpha libc Thrift implementation. I¹ve worked with
that code for a while, it¹s *not* pretty.
I can¹t think of one reason, other than ³I
Hi Aswani Kumar,
Please let me know, any specific reasons that you're recommending thrift?
Thanks
Murali.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Aswani Kumar Vonteddu <
as.wins.c...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I'd recommend Thrift.
>
> > Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 14:08:52 -0500
> > Subject: CQL or Thrift ?
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo