Hi Aswani Kumar, Please let me know, any specific reasons that you're recommending thrift?
Thanks Murali. On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Aswani Kumar Vonteddu < as.wins.c...@hotmail.com> wrote: > I'd recommend Thrift. > > > Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 14:08:52 -0500 > > Subject: CQL or Thrift ? > > From: nulik...@gmail.com > > To: dev@cassandra.apache.org > > > > Hi, > > I need a client in C (not C++) to work with Cassandra, so since there > > is no one yet I would do my own. So far I have checked, I can do it > > through Thrift RPC port, or through CQL port. As I understand, CQL > > doesn't support direct "mutate" or "get_range_slices" calls like > > Thrift does , so being Thrift API more low level, it should be faster > > for specific queries my application would execute. The question is, > > what do you recommend me to use, Thrift or CQL3 native protocol? > > Thrift API supports CQL , but not the other way around. If commands > > go through CQL, there will be some Java code executed and I don't know > > which would be faster, sending the raw "mutate"s through thrift by C > > application or executing a prepared CQL3 query by Java? I am > > interested more in performance, rather than in easiness of use. Will > > appreciate very much your comments. > > > > Nulik > > -- Thanks, Murali 99025-33335
