Hi Rob,
Kindly remind you about the patch :)
thank you,
Alexander
2013/11/12 Alexander Ivchenko :
> Ok, thank you!
>
>
> I will :)
>
> --Alexander
>
> 2013/11/12 Rob Savoye :
>> On 11/05/2013 04:43 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>>
>>> What's the next step for the patch? Given your OK, could you
Ok, thank you!
I will :)
--Alexander
2013/11/12 Rob Savoye :
> On 11/05/2013 04:43 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>
>> What's the next step for the patch? Given your OK, could you please
>> submit it?
>
> Sorry, I've been traveling to conferences. Yeah, I'll commit it, feel
> free to nag me if
On 11/05/2013 04:43 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> What's the next step for the patch? Given your OK, could you please
> submit it?
Sorry, I've been traveling to conferences. Yeah, I'll commit it, feel
free to nag me if I don't do it this week.
- rob -
Hi, Rob,
What's the next step for the patch? Given your OK, could you please submit it?
thanks,
Alexander
2013/10/20 Alexander Ivchenko :
>> While I like the idea of the 'cross' code going into a later patch,
>> It's not a big deal either way, so yeah, it's ok. Did you file a
>> copyright assi
> While I like the idea of the 'cross' code going into a later patch,
> It's not a big deal either way, so yeah, it's ok. Did you file a
> copyright assignment with the FSF ?
Thanks! Yes, I signed it and it's been sent to FSF ~7 monthes ago..
--Alexander
2013/10/18 Rob Savoye :
> On 10/15/2
On 10/15/2013 07:26 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> The "cross" addition in DejaGNU and the correspoding change in the
> test itself ({ target native cross }) would allow us to run them.
> Defining cross as '1' in androideabi
> board is not a very pretty solution, but I don't see others now..
M
> I'd like to see the 'iscross' proc removed, ! 'isnative' should be
> sufficient. I'm a touch confused, this looks like you are also
> supporting native builds on Android ?
No, we don't do native builds on Android.. The reason behind this
change was that some tests in gcc have { target native }
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/14/2013 04:14 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> Rob, would you mind reviewing this patch? You know this bit of code
> better than I do.
I'd like to see the 'iscross' proc removed, ! 'isnative' should be
sufficient. I'm a touch confused, this looks l
Hi Ben,
2013/10/14 Ben Elliston :
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0400, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>
>> .., which solved almost all of our problems. So the patch that is
>> pending review
>> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2013-02/msg0.html)
>> Is no longer needed (but there i
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 10:34:58AM +0400, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
> .., which solved almost all of our problems. So the patch that is
> pending review
> (http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2013-02/msg0.html)
> Is no longer needed (but there is a still open question about Tizen..)
Is
10 matches
Mail list logo