Hi, Rob,
What's the next step for the patch? Given your OK, could you please submit it?
thanks,
Alexander
2013/10/20 Alexander Ivchenko <aivch...@gmail.com>:
>> While I like the idea of the 'cross' code going into a later patch,
>> It's not a big deal either way, so yeah, it's ok. Did you file a
>> copyright assignment with the FSF ?
>
> Thanks! Yes, I signed it and it's been sent to FSF ~7 monthes ago..
>
>
>
> --Alexander
>
>
> 2013/10/18 Rob Savoye <r...@welcomehome.org>:
>> On 10/15/2013 07:26 AM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
>>
>>> The "cross" addition in DejaGNU and the correspoding change in the
>>> test itself ({ target native cross }) would allow us to run them.
>>> Defining cross as '1' in androideabi
>>> board is not a very pretty solution, but I don't see others now..
>>
>> Much of the board support code in DejaGnu isn't very pretty either. At
>> least these days we're not still having to download srecords at 9600 baud...
>>
>>> Well, not in that matter. The problem with the permissions depends on
>>> the image; Some images unset the executable bit during pushing through
>>> adb. So in order to avoid that we added this check.
>>
>> Makes sense.
>>
>>> Thanks, I attached the updated version.
>>> Is it OK?
>>
>> While I like the idea of the 'cross' code going into a later patch,
>> It's not a big deal either way, so yeah, it's ok. Did you file a
>> copyright assignment with the FSF ?
>>
>> - rob -
>>
_______________________________________________
DejaGnu mailing list
DejaGnu@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
