NightStrike wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:30 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
NightStrike wrote:
[...]
I did another little test to try to better understand your point. I
ran a linux native testsuite under a simulator that just sets SIM to "
". This resulted in extra ^M's also, although
NightStrike wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:06 AM NightStrike wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:56 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
NightStrike wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jacek Caban wrote:
Sure, I'd be interested how well my latest patch works for NightStrike
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023, 04:19 NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jacek Caban wrote:
> > Sure, I'd be interested how well my latest patch works for NightStrike.
> > It should give us overview about how much conhost interferes with test
> > results in practice when we get easy stuf
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:30 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > [...]
> > I did another little test to try to better understand your point. I
> > ran a linux native testsuite under a simulator that just sets SIM to "
> > ". This resulted in extra ^M's also, although many tests
Better presentation thanks to Jacob
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 4:19 AM NightStrike wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jacek Caban wrote:
> > Sure, I'd be interested how well my latest patch works for NightStrike.
> > It should give us overview about how much conhost interferes with test
> >
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:06 AM NightStrike wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:56 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >
> > NightStrike wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jacek Caban wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sure, I'd be interested how well my latest patch works for NightStrike.
> > >> It should
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:56 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jacek Caban wrote:
> >
> >> Sure, I'd be interested how well my latest patch works for NightStrike.
> >> It should give us overview about how much conhost interferes with test
> >> re
