Better presentation thanks to Jacob
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 4:19 AM NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 11:05 AM Jacek Caban <ja...@codeweavers.com> wrote:
> > Sure, I'd be interested how well my latest patch works for NightStrike.
> > It should give us overview about how much conhost interferes with test
> > results in practice when we get easy stuff out of the way.
>
> Generally, more tests run and pass, but most still fail for different
> reasons. IOW, the cursor hiding escapes are gone, but the EOLs still
> don't match until we modify the tests themselves. Here are the result
> summaries, full logs available to anyone who wants them.
>
> Unmodified Wine 7.20:
__________________________________________________
/ PASS FAIL ?PASS ?FAIL UNSUP UNRES UNTEST
|--------------------------------------------------
gcc | 166638 1765 12 1226 3107 787 0 !E!
gfortran | 64445 608 8 238 247 6 0
gm2 | 7126 2563 0 0 0 2065 0
g++ | 217936 1336 4 2144 11318 63 0 !E! !W!
libatomic | 53 1 0 0 0 0 0 !W!
libstdc++ | 14139 263 2 93 835 1 0
rust | 4185 403 0 39 0 0 0 !W!
|--------------------------------------------------
| 474522 6939 26 3740 15507 2922 0
\__________________________________________________
> Modified Wine 7.20 using your latest one liner patch:
__________________________________________________
/ PASS FAIL ?PASS ?FAIL UNSUP UNRES UNTEST
|--------------------------------------------------
gcc | 168207 1867 12 1235 3118 760 0 !E! !W!
gfortran | 66403 619 8 257 247 6 0 !W!
gm2 | 7126 2563 0 0 0 2065 0
g++ | 220403 1116 4 2063 10978 47 0 !E! !W!
libatomic | 53 1 0 0 0 0 0 !W!
libstdc++ | 14139 474 2 98 835 1 0 !W!
rust | 4568 394 0 39 0 0 0 !W!
|--------------------------------------------------
| 480899 7034 26 3692 15178 2879 0
\__________________________________________________
