On 03/23/2016 12:36 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:29:56AM +, Pedro Alves wrote:
Yes. RDI was removed many years ago:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-08/msg00668.html
Your clock runs fast. This was only six months ago. :-)
Not really, you need to open
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:29:56AM +, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Yes. RDI was removed many years ago:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-08/msg00668.html
Your clock runs fast. This was only six months ago. :-)
Ben
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
On 03/23/2016 12:23 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:32:18PM +, Pedro Alves wrote:
Good riddance. Any of these that doesn't use gdb_protocol "remote" is not
usable with current upstream GDB, as support for the target has already
been removed from the tree in past releases,
On 03/22/2016 10:28 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> The following files are in the config/ directory. Many of these are
> very, very old. Can you please let me know if you suggest (a)
> removing a file immediately (and if so, which one) or (b) marking a
> file for removal after the next release.
>
> T
I removed the old config files as discussed plus any baseboard that
loaded them. This leaves the following basebords -- what can go? Be
ruthless!
Cheers, Ben
am33_2.0-libremote.exp
androideabi.exp
arm-sid.exp
basic-sid.exp
basic-sim.exp
cris-sim.exp
cygwin.exp
d3
On 03/22/2016 01:15 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> +# Don't try to execute a data file, which is used by some tests
> +# to compare output.
> +if {[regexp "^\.txt$" $prog]} {
> + return ""
> +}
>
> Wouldn't it be better to not call unix_load with such an argument?
Unix_load is
On 03/22/2016 04:28 AM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> The following files are in the config/ directory. Many of these are
> very, very old. Can you please let me know if you suggest (a)
> removing a file immediately (and if so, which one) or (b) marking a
> file for removal after the next release.
>
> T
The following files are in the config/ directory. Many of these are
very, very old. Can you please let me know if you suggest (a)
removing a file immediately (and if so, which one) or (b) marking a
file for removal after the next release.
Then we can start on the baseboards. :-)
Thanks, Ben
ad
Hi Rob
I've just looked at your patch here:
https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?8947
This seems a bit odd to me:
+# Don't try to execute a data file, which is used by some tests
+# to compare output.
+if {[regexp "^\.txt$" $prog]} {
+ return ""
+}
Wouldn't it be better
