Re: PATCH: rewrite utils.exp:which

2016-03-21 Thread Rob Savoye
On 03/21/2016 01:50 PM, Ben Elliston wrote: > There was a '???' comment in utils.exp:which, so I rewrote it to > properly mimic the behaviour of the which(1) shell utility. A nice > side effect of the new version is that, because the new proc > normalises the filename when it's found, the GCC test

PATCH: rewrite utils.exp:which

2016-03-21 Thread Ben Elliston
There was a '???' comment in utils.exp:which, so I rewrote it to properly mimic the behaviour of the which(1) shell utility. A nice side effect of the new version is that, because the new proc normalises the filename when it's found, the GCC testsuite reports: /home/bje/build/gcc/gcc/xg++ vers