On 03/21/2016 01:50 PM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> There was a '???' comment in utils.exp:which, so I rewrote it to
> properly mimic the behaviour of the which(1) shell utility. A nice
> side effect of the new version is that, because the new proc
> normalises the filename when it's found, the GCC testsuite reports:
>
> /home/bje/build/gcc/gcc/xg++ version 6.0.0 20160310 (experimental) (GCC)
>
> instead of:
>
> /home/bje/build/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../xg++ version 6.0.0 20160310
> (experimental) (GCC)
>
> Here's the patch. Tested with `make check' and a GCC testsuite run.
> Any comments?
Was that testing done for a native build ? I can try it for cross
toolchains on my build farm for ARMv7/ARMv8 if so. The patch looks right
though, but a little paranoia goes a long way when it comes to toolchain
validation...
- rob -
_______________________________________________
DejaGnu mailing list
DejaGnu@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dejagnu
