Bug#572372: marked as done (ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look)

2014-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Jul 2014 17:19:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#572372: fixed in wdm 1.28-17 has caused the Debian Bug report #572372, regarding ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#572372: O -> ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2014-07-25 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Agustin, Agustin Martin wrote: > Hi, Axel, nice to hear that someone is adopting wdm. Well, nobody else did... And we're still prefering it at work and I use it on all my machines with X on it. > I did not intend to adopt it because I do not think my skills are > enough for th

Bug#572372: O -> ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2014-07-25 Thread Agustin Martin
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 02:10:59PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Control: retitle -1 ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement > with a WindowMaker look > Control: owner -1 ! > > Hi, > > I intent to adopt the wdm package. > Agustin Martin wrote in 2010: >

Bug#572372: O -> ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2014-07-25 Thread Axel Beckert
Control: retitle -1 ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look Control: owner -1 ! Hi, I intent to adopt the wdm package. I want to keep wdm in Debian because I think it's a good compromise between xdm (which IMHO has everything except a possibili

Processed: Re: Bug#572372: O -> ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2014-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a > WindowMaker look Bug #572372 [wnpp] O: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look Changed Bug title to 'ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm

Processed: O: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2014-02-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > noowner 572372 Bug #572372 [wnpp] O: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Rodolfo García Peñas . > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Bug#572372: ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2013-09-22 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Rodolfo, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote: > > > but I sent the email with the wrong sender :-/ > > > > I've configured my mutt to use my @d.o address as from header if any > > of the recipients have "debian.org" or "ubuntu.com" in their address. > > Helps a lot in such cases. :-) > > Ummm, I am us

Bug#572372: ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2013-09-22 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas
On Sun, 22 Sep 2013, Axel Beckert escribió: > Hi Rodolfo, > > Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) wrote: > > Currently I am DD (kix@d.o) > > Ah, sorry, didn't know that. The DD list is very big, and I am new :-) > > but I sent the email with the wrong sender :-/ > > I've configured my mutt to use my

Bug#572372: ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2013-09-22 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Rodolfo, Rodolfo García Peñas (kix) wrote: > Currently I am DD (kix@d.o) Ah, sorry, didn't know that. > but I sent the email with the wrong sender :-/ I've configured my mutt to use my @d.o address as from header if any of the recipients have "debian.org" or "ubuntu.com" in their address. He

Bug#572372: ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2013-09-22 Thread kix
Thanks Axel, Currently I am DD (kix@d.o) but I sent the email with the wrong sender :-/ Cheers Rodolfo Axel Beckert escribió: >Control: retitle -1 ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm >replacement with a WindowMaker look >Control: owner -1 Rodolfo García Peñas > >Hi Rodo

Processed: Re: ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2013-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a > WindowMaker look Bug #572372 [wnpp] O: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look Changed Bug title to 'ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm

Bug#572372: ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2013-09-22 Thread Axel Beckert
Control: retitle -1 ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look Control: owner -1 Rodolfo García Peñas Hi Rodolfo, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote: > I will update the package. (With this mail I'm retitling the bug-report accordingly and setting you as t

Bug#572372: ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2013-09-22 Thread Rodolfo García Peñas
Hi, I will update the package. Cheers, kix -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130922120141.ga29...@kix.es

Bug#572372: O: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2011-08-02 Thread Michelle Konzack
ill never need. So,if I search in aptitude for "display-manager" in "squeeze" I get slim (does not support remote login) gdm gdm3 xdm kdm So, time to get "wdm" back into Debian for "wheeze" > WDM has the unique feature that it has not all the blo

Bug#572372: O: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2011-08-02 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Next step might be to remove it [wdm] from Debian alltogether. We do > not really need all the display managers currently in the archive. > :) I disagree strongly. WDM has the unique feature that it has not all the bloaty crap and broken design that kdm

Bug#572372: O: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2010-03-21 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
ll the display managers currently in the archive. :) I do not use wdm, but am interested in seeing the new Xreset.d feature in Squeeze for all display managers. :) Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "

Bug#572372: O: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2010-03-15 Thread Agustin Martin
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:28:47PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > The current maintainer of wdm, Vlad Shakhov , > is not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. No, I do not intend to adopt this package, but have some changes r

Bug#572372: O: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2010-03-03 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
Package: wnpp Severity: normal The current maintainer of wdm, Vlad Shakhov , is not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now. Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this package if you will have enough time and attention to work on it. If you want to be

Bug#323600: marked as done (ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look)

2005-08-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 04:47:07 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#323600: fixed in wdm 1.28-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

Bug#323600: Acknowledgement (ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look)

2005-08-17 Thread Vladimir Shakhov
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian. > This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message has > been received. It is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other > interested parties for their attention; th

Bug#323600: ITA: wdm -- WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker look

2005-08-17 Thread Vladimir Shakhov
Package: wnpp Severity: normal http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/wdm -- Vladimir 'mend0za' Shakhov, icq 78193930 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

WDM

2005-07-09 Thread Joseph Ates
I use this personally on every debian box I own and would like to maintain it. I'm a second year electrical engineering student at purdue although I've taken data struct courses and the like. Pax, Joseph Ates -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Bug#287873: update on wdm development an bugs

2005-03-08 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Hi Noah, as you may have noticed I started testing if some of wdm bugs are still reproducible and sent a note to the submitters. I also started looking ad the wdm source and asked for some help in the wdm mailing list. The good news is that some of the bugs are already fixed, the bad news is that

Bug#287873: Offer for co-maintaining WDM

2005-02-24 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Hi Noah, during the last few days I did an NMU for this package and started looking at the wholi bug list. I think I might collaborate in maintaining wdm, but I not sure about the time I may spend on it. So, if you agree, I might start fixing a few bugs and prepare some more NMU during the

Processed: ITA: wdm

2001-03-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 88582 ITA: wdm Bug#88582: RFA: wdm Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#88582: RFA: wdm

2001-03-08 Thread Arthur Korn
Hi Noah L. Meyerhans schrieb: > Sorry, I didn't see the original announcement of this bug. Arther, if Arthur please > you don't feel entirely comfortable adopting the package, I'll take it. > I can spend the necessary time on it to ensure the bugs don't pile up, > and am good with C. Consider

Bug#88582: RFA: wdm

2001-03-08 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
+0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Arthur! > > You wrote: > > > If nobody else want's to do it I'll take the package, though I > > can't spend too much time on it. I don't know C well either, > > without upstream I can't really do it. > &g

Bug#88582: RFA: wdm

2001-03-08 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Arthur! You wrote: > If nobody else want's to do it I'll take the package, though I > can't spend too much time on it. I don't know C well either, > without upstream I can't really do it. > But I use wdm, and like it. I have had no other reactions, so

Bug#88582: RFA: wdm

2001-03-05 Thread Arthur Korn
Hi If nobody else want's to do it I'll take the package, though I can't spend too much time on it. I don't know C well either, without upstream I can't really do it. But I use wdm, and like it. ciao, 2ri -- locate sunny|grep place|xargs cat|paste ~/me sleep 4h

Bug#88582: RFA: wdm

2001-03-05 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Package: wnpp Version: n/a; reported 2000/03/05 Severity: normal I'ld like to orphan wdm, because at the moment I don't have the time to fix its bugs. At the moment, there are 7 outstanding bugs (1 important, 5 normal, 1 wishlist). Upstream is not very responsive. -- Ki