Hi Agustin,
Agustin Martin wrote:
> Hi, Axel, nice to hear that someone is adopting wdm.
Well, nobody else did... And we're still prefering it at work and I
use it on all my machines with X on it.
> I did not intend to adopt it because I do not think my skills are
> enough for the internals of a package like this one.
Yeah, that's one of the reasons why I hestitated for a long time, too.
The other one is the inactive upstream.
I'll likely learn the one or other thing, too. We'll see how well it
goes.
> Also, since it started as a fork of xdm, a number of problems once
> present in xdm and now fixed might still be in wdm. And upstream
> seemed missing, one more reason.
Not completely. But pretty inactive, yes.
> I noticed that you are doing a nice packaging work with wdm. I still
> use wdm in one of my boxes, so I'd happily help testing changes in
> it, but apart from that I do not think I will be of much help with
> wdm.
Well, looking at the changelog you did help a lot for the package's
well-being. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140725165821.gd12...@sym.noone.org
