Your message dated Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:25:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#969202: fixed in binutils-avr 2.26.20160125+Atmel3.6.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #969202,
regarding ITA: binutils-avr -- Binary utilities supporting Atmel's AVR targets
to be marked as done.
Control: retitle -1 RFA: binutils-avr -- Binary utilities supporting Atmel's
AVR targets
Control: noowner -1
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:32:41 -0700 Steve M wrote:
Joshua,
It has been a little over a year since you changed binutils-avr from RFA to ITA.
Do you still intend to proceed with this adop
> as I am considering adopting avr-libc, binutils-avr, and
> gcc-avr as a group.
Hi Steve,
Past few days I've been trying to package them as well and I'll be more
than happy to help you.
-Matěj
Joshua,
It has been a little over a year since you changed binutils-avr from RFA to ITA.
Do you still intend to proceed with this adoption? If not, please consider
returning it to RFA as I am considering adopting avr-libc, binutils-avr, and
gcc-avr as a group.
Thanks
-Steve
Hi Joshua,
Thank you for proposing to take over maintenance of the AVR toolchain in
Debian! I'd be very sad if it had to be abandoned.
To start off, may I point your attention to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983993 ?
This is a pretty serious issue, and I can't find any inform
Owner: knapper...@aol.com
Control: retitle -1 ITA: binutils-avr -- Binary utilities supporting Atmel's
AVR targets
Control: retitle -1 ITA: binutils-avr -- Binary utilities supporting Atmel's
AVR targetsControl: owner knapper...@aol.com
Maintainer,
Would like to start contributing by taking over this package.
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the binutils-avr package. I'm lacking the time
to propperly maintain it.
The package description is:
The programs in this package are used to manipulate binary and object
files that may have been created for Atmel's AVR architecture. Thi
9 matches
Mail list logo
