On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:10:04PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> Is there still a point to keeping the rdoc package around? It looks like
> it depends on Ruby 1.8, so it's equivalent to the rdoc1.8 package. If
> this is the case, I would suggest just removing rdoc and maybe renaming
> rdoc1.8 to rd
Hi everyone,
Is there still a point to keeping the rdoc package around? It looks like
it depends on Ruby 1.8, so it's equivalent to the rdoc1.8 package. If
this is the case, I would suggest just removing rdoc and maybe renaming
rdoc1.8 to rdoc.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I no longer use this package and am ill-equipped to maintain it.
Brian
3 matches
Mail list logo
