On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:10:04PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > Is there still a point to keeping the rdoc package around? It looks like > it depends on Ruby 1.8, so it's equivalent to the rdoc1.8 package. If > this is the case, I would suggest just removing rdoc and maybe renaming > rdoc1.8 to rdoc.
Well as I exspect ri to drag ri1.8 along, and ruby ruby1.8 because it's just the current version, I was already confused that there was not an rdoc virtual package. So I would suggest to make this the same as all other ruby related binary packages. A rdoc dummy package depending on rdoc1.8. I believe this isn't mentioned in the Ruby Policy[1] though, only for modules[2]. Paul 1: http://pkg-ruby.alioth.debian.org/ruby-policy.html/ch-programs.html 2: http://pkg-ruby.alioth.debian.org/ruby-policy.html/ch-module_packages.html -- Student @ Eindhoven | JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Technology, The Netherlands | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
