Bug#203896: Processed: I'll take yydecode

2005-06-21 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Martin Michlmayr wrote: >>sharutils contains the only "uudecode" in Debian, so I'm not sure what >>the commentor in the bug was talking about. > > > OK, interesting. Yeah, maybe uudecode isn't the package he's talking about. apt-cache search yenc didn't help though. A quick check shows that we'

Bug#203896: Processed: I'll take yydecode

2005-06-21 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Martin Michlmayr wrote: >>I currently use this package to handle yEnc files which pan proves >>unable to decode, e.g., because the first post is missing. Advantages >>over sharutils are, if nothing else, being less than an eighth the size. > > > Can you please review bug #177370 and let me know

Bug#203896: Processed: I'll take yydecode

2005-06-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-06-21 08:36]: > sharutils contains the only "uudecode" in Debian, so I'm not sure what > the commentor in the bug was talking about. OK, interesting. > I guess I should go ahead and start preparing an updated package for > yydecode. OK. -- Martin M

Bug#203896: Processed: I'll take yydecode

2005-06-13 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Can you please review bug #177370 and let me know whether it makes > sense to keep this package (i.e. does uuencode/uudecode really have > this functionality or not). The main thing I've used yydecode for is that it has managed to handle every broken, incomplete, mangled

Bug#203896: Processed: I'll take yydecode

2005-06-12 Thread Martin Michlmayr
> I currently use this package to handle yEnc files which pan proves > unable to decode, e.g., because the first post is missing. Advantages > over sharutils are, if nothing else, being less than an eighth the size. Can you please review bug #177370 and let me know whether it makes sense to keep