Martin Michlmayr wrote:

> Can you please review bug #177370 and let me know whether it makes
> sense to keep this package (i.e. does uuencode/uudecode really have
> this functionality or not).

The main thing I've used yydecode for is that it has managed to handle
every broken, incomplete, mangled file I have thrown at it. I'll give
uudecode a spin on some when I come across them, or intentionally create
some and report back.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to