Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> I like '-base', though, because this package is a dependency
> of apmd (and later, perhaps, of acpid) and contains
> /etc/modutils/apm. Later the package might create a new
> group for power management --- that sort of thing.
>
BTW, why is
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 03:34, Chris Halls wrote:
> powermgmt-utils?
Hmm. Not bad.
I like '-base', though, because this package is a dependency
of apmd (and later, perhaps, of acpid) and contains
/etc/modutils/apm. Later the package might create a new
group for power management --- that sort of t
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> > Is "powermanagement-base" not an option?
> > If it's a package that normal users won't install directly,
> > it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish.
>
> Can you come up with a shorter suggestion?
My suggest
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:20:03AM -0500, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 19:53, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Is "powermanagement-base" not an option?
> > If it's a package that normal users won't install directly,
> > it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish.
>
On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 19:53, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Is "powermanagement-base" not an option?
> If it's a package that normal users won't install directly,
> it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish.
Can you come up with a shorter suggestion?
signature.asc
Descriptio
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> The name of this package has been provisionally changed
> to pm-base. Unless someone suggests something better,
> that's what we'll use.
Why does it need to be abbreviated ?
Is "powermanagement-base" not an option?
If it's a package that
The name of this package has been provisionally changed
to pm-base. Unless someone suggests something better,
that's what we'll use.
--
Thomas Hood
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
7 matches
Mail list logo
