On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:20:03AM -0500, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 19:53, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Is "powermanagement-base" not an option? > > If it's a package that normal users won't install directly, > > it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish. > > Can you come up with a shorter suggestion?
powermgmt-utils? I'm saying utils rather than base or common, because it provides a set of small utilities for power management and that makes it more obvious (for me, at least). HTH, Chris -- Chris Halls | Frankfurt, Germany
