On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 02:04:42AM +, Philip Kendall wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:50:41AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Phil, what would you recommend? Can either emulator be made to behave
> > the other way, or will the package have to include both?
>
> Due to the licence conditions,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:50:41AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > However, various emulators have different ideas about whether the ROM
> > sets for these machines should be stored as one file per page or one
> > file per machine; fuse (unofficially packaged; see .sig) does the
> > former, and x
[Note, [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't sent to the submitter - I happened to notice
this through the web interface, though.]
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 05:12:42PM +, Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Colin Watson may or may not have written...
> > I have been informed that the Spectrum ROM currently dis
I demand that Colin Watson may or may not have written...
> * Package name: spectrum-rom
[snip]
> I have been informed that the Spectrum ROM currently distributed as part of
> the spectemu package is non-free (it can't be sold, and it can't be
> embedded in hardware), although Amstrad have no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: spectrum-rom
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Clive Sinclair / Amstrad
* License : Non-free but distributable
Description : ZX Spectrum ROM
I have been informed that the Spectrum ROM currently distributed as part
of the
5 matches
Mail list logo
