plain Wheezy + Samba 4.0.10
packages from unstable.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAJn8KfCXjcL8BKfT6VqetTjCGKiXfiRf=x1zuahzjtq+1ib...@mail.gmail.com
Given that this ITP was filed over a year ago, should it be retitled to RFP?
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.
vconf in debian/control.
N.B. In dnsmasq 2.66-3 the resolvconf hook script has been changed
such that, now, if the record "lo.dnscrypt" is present then dnsmasq
forwards DNS queries exclusively to the addressed listed therein.
--
Thomas Hood
The Samba team has been very busy preparing a unified, solid, and
policy-compliant package based on release 4.0.6. Those guys deserve some
serious respect. Their package will soon appear in experimental and then
unstable and in Ubuntu.
Once this package appears and has stabilized for a few weeks,
Winexe in the winexe-waf repository now builds nicely against the Samba 4
public API and shared libraries as represented by Debian Samba 4 packages
and I am hoping, therefore, that there will soon be a new Winexe release
based on this winexe-waf code.
Once Winexe has been released it would be very
ovide more up-to-date packages than mine?
--
Thomas Hood
Upstream contains a rather verbose debian/changelog. Could this be edited
down, renamed and/or merged with ChangeLog so that debian/changelog
contains exclusively a log of *Debian's* work? Or how do you feel about
this?
--
Thomas Hood
(Maintainer of provisory libnfc packages at ppa:jdthood/nfc)
How's it going with the packaging of libnfc? Are you waiting for the
1.6.0 release?
--
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAJn8KfD2rhEpfHWktM9Dm
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 15:28, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Which headers are necessary?
Here are the header files that are #included by winexe source files
but which I couldn't find in the -dev packages.
* includes.h = source4/include/includes.h
* libcli/libcli.h = source4/libcli/libcli.h
* libcli/
I have submitted the revised source code (i.e., winexe ported to
current samba git "master" branch) to winexe's author but it is not
yet clear to me what he plans to do with it.
The winexe build needs access to the samba source tree. This has not
changed in my port. I have looked into the possib
and seems to work fine.
I hope to release new versions of the package soon with,
to start with, a proper man page. Help with improving the
package will be welcome.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
winexe/winexesvc/Makefile
383 winexe/winexesvc/winexesvc32_exe.c
19 winexe/winexesvc/shared.h
385 winexe/service.c
447 winexe/winexe.c
24 winexe/config.mk
260 winexe/async.c
74 winexe/winexe.h
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
for Debian too.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dd2340c.8070...@gmail.com
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I hope that someone will volunteer to maintain this Debian-native package.
It is currently in good condition.
--
Thomas Hood
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp, thinkpad
Severity: wishlist
I am the author of the "tpctl" utility and of the "thinkpad" modules
that go with it. I wrote the software six years ago and I have
continued to update it since then. I am also the maintainer of the
Debian packages (thinkpad-base, thinkpad-source, tpctl
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the mwavem package.
I own a ThinkPad 600 with an Mwave modem inside and I use this
to test the mwavem packages that I prepare. However, I do not use
the machine on a daily basis. If possible I would like help from
someone who
to the sound synthesis server.
>
> SC was written by James McCartney over a period of many years. It is now
> an open source GPL'd project maintained and developed by James and a few
> others.
I know this program on the Mac. Is the free version the same
as the Mac version or is i
Andreas Barth wrote:
> The mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> in d-d
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200302/msg5.html
> seems to have a different opinion for ifupdown, and I don't
> see reason why this should be different between ifupdown and
> resolvconf.
There is no difference
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 21:32, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I would ask for the package to provide a virtual package. That would
> it make much easier if there might arise the need of having two
> different packages with the same interface to the rest of debian at
> any future time. Introducing a virtual p
mental version of resolvconf installed on
your system then you should PURGE that version before installing
a new version; otherwise obsolete configuration files might be left
around.
Feedback about the package is welcome. Please let me know about
any other packages that should be made to work with
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: resolvconf
Version : 0.31
Upstream Author : Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://alioth.debian.org/projects/update-resolv
* License : GPL
Descr
Please note that I have contacted some IBM people to ask about
the license. I'll try to get some sort of official statement
out of them.
On Sat, 2002-03-30 at 08:59, Colin Watson wrote:
> Er, right, OK. That's not what the Maintainer: field in powermgmt-base
> says though.
You're right: I am listed as the maintainer on powermgmt-base.
However it was Chris Hanson who did the upload for me. He has also
been doing all the recent apm
Colin Watson wrote:
> (Actually, it looks like all of these bugs were
> maintainer uploads that got treated as NMUs because a sponsor used the
> -m flag to dpkg-buildpackage.)
So they were all NMUs by Chris Hanson.
The maintainer is Avery Pennarun.
--
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 03:34, Chris Halls wrote:
> powermgmt-utils?
Hmm. Not bad.
I like '-base', though, because this package is a dependency
of apmd (and later, perhaps, of acpid) and contains
/etc/modutils/apm. Later the package might create a new
group for power management --- that sort of t
On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 19:53, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Is "powermanagement-base" not an option?
> If it's a package that normal users won't install directly,
> it won't cause too much trouble, even if the package name is longish.
Can you come up with a shorter suggestion?
signature.asc
Descriptio
The name of this package has been provisionally changed
to pm-base. Unless someone suggests something better,
that's what we'll use.
--
Thomas Hood
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 11:01, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> no, it is the 'pm' part that is confusing. -common, -base, -essential. Name
> it how you like. But the name 'pm-common' or 'pm-base' tells me nothing about
> the package or why anacron or apmd want it.
What name do you suggest?
signatu
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 20:36, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> I do not oppose the package itself, but could it be given a more obvious name?
How about 'pm-base' ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-03-11
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pm-common
Version : 1.0 (Debian native)
* License : GPL
Description : Power management utilities common to APM and ACPI
The apmd packaging team wants to move the on_ac_power, apm_availab
30 matches
Mail list logo
