On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 20:36, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > I do not oppose the package itself, but could it be given a more obvious name?
How about 'pm-base' ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 20:36, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > I do not oppose the package itself, but could it be given a more obvious name?
How about 'pm-base' ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part