OK, so here it is then. I don't think it got into the bug so I'm
attaching Jeff's critique of my initial packaging. I have not found
time to address any of these so if anyone want's to give it a go, feel
free to use http://jlb.distractionlabs.com/python-pylucene_r91.tar.gz as
a starting point
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
So Jeff what can I do? I already build and install pylucene on several
Debian machines with every new version but it's been a couple of years
since I've made a Debian package. Could you crank one out if I gave you
build instructions and dependencies?
I will not
One possibility is for Debian's lucene package to do both javac and
gcj compilation. It would provide both a java and native library
version of lucene. Then a separate pylucene package would handle swig
and creation of the python module. This would have the advantage of
making lucene available
I also have wondered about lucene.patches but I never bothered to ask.
Aside from that I like your plan and I'm willing to help if there's
anything I can do.
Jeff Breidenbach wrote:
I'm the maintainer of Debian's lucene package, and I noticed interest
in bringing pylucene into the distribut
I had some troubles with gcc-3.3 but it works great now that gcc-3.4 is
in unstable. Here's my diff to the Makefile. License for pylucene is
MIT-ish but it includes lucene itself which is Apache License v 2.0.
Not sure how to get the attention of the right person to package this.
It only n
5 matches
Mail list logo
