A preliminary package is available at
http://www.mathgen.ch/debian/experimental
If anyone is interested in testing it, that would be great. Note that
this package currently conflicts with the w3c-markup-validator, which
also contains the linkchecker; this will be solved by a new upload of
the v
Quoting Ivo Timmermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> cryptoapi-core-source does not supersede kernel-patch-int, see bug
> #169038. For people who use 2.2 kernels, kernel-patch-int will still
> be useful.
... but kernel-patch-int doesn't seem to work with woody anyway (see
#80957), neither does Sarge.
Hi,
it seems to me that the package kernel-patch-int should not only be
orphaned but also be removed entirely from the archive (sarge/sid).
The package is outdated and does not work on either woody or sarge/sid, and
since it is not supported by upstream anymore, this won't change in the
future.
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: eprints
Version : 2.2.1
Upstream Author : Christopher Gutteridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://software.eprints.org/
* License : GPL (v2 or later)
Description : an onli
Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>I might be interested in sponsoring it. How does it compare to
>wdg-html-validator? Is there any point in having both packaged?
The page http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/differences.html lists
some differences (they aren't many) between the two versions. They do
ba
[please cc me -- and sorry for breaking the "references" field]
Darren Salt wrote
>> * Package name: w3c-html-validator
>> Version : 0.6.0b1 (beta version, in CVS)
>
>I did a few things on this myself a while ago; I can make available what I
>have in case it would help.
I'm interes
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-10-23
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: w3c-html-validator
Version : 0.6.0b1 (beta version, in CVS)
Upstream Author : W3C Validator Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://validator.w3.org:8001/
* License : W3C Software
7 matches
Mail list logo
