Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the dejagnu package.
The package description is:
DejaGnu is a framework for testing other programs. Its purpose is to
provide a single front end for all tests.
.
DejaGnu provides a layer of abstraction which allows you to write
tests that ar
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the gdb-doc package. I suggest that the same
person adopt this as adopts gdb. Instructions and tools for creating
the source package are in debian/README.source (in the GDB source
package, not this one).
The package description is:
GDB is a sou
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the gdb package. I will continue to intermittently
follow upstream development, and upstream is pretty active; not a lot
of Debian-local work is needed. There's a couple of local patches
(bad Dan!) which could be submitted. Or possibly dropped w
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am orphaning amd64-libs.
This package is less used now, and very stale. It's possible that
it should be removed instead of adopted.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
enty of installations of
perforce; I think making it easier to use Debian with them is
within the mandate for non-free.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dable button that shows all rsync status output.
This sounds awesome! I've wanted this plenty of times recently.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 06:21:17AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> retitle 385929 ITA: vsftpd -- The Very Secure FTP Daemon
> owner 385929 !
> thanks
>
> Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I request an adopter for the vsftpd package.
>
> I'd
till get them by email.
I'd like to retire the old ncurses-maint address (it gets mostly spam
now).
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:12:16PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > I request an adopter for the ncurses package.
>
> I would like to adopt it if you agree.
I see you've already uploaded it :-) Would you like the SVN and bug
history, or do you
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the vsftpd package.
The package description is:
A lightweight, efficient FTP server written from the ground up with
security in mind.
.
vsftpd supports both anonymous and non-anonymous FTP, PAM authentication,
bandwidth limiting, and th
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the ncurses package.
Ncurses is not hard to maintain; the upstream maintainer, Thomas Dickey,
reads Debian bug reports and tends to fix them far more frequently than
I can manage to upload them. I haven't had time to take proper care of
thi
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the ircii-pana package.
The package description is:
This is the bleeding edge of IRC software -- the most common
functions normally done by scripts are coded into the client itself.
It contains dozens of features such as:
.
* Built-
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the bogl package.
The package description is:
Ben's Own Graphics Library is a small framebuffer library,
including basic widgets, support for text in multiple
languages, and mouse handling.
.
This package contains bterm, a UTF-enabled f
tion:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSource
d I would rather
> package a released version.
I don't believe it will work out of the box. I was asking about an ACT
version of 6.0, and you say there isn't one.
Go ahead, I guess. I just hope we can remove it again someday.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
ologies,
> the company behind GNAT. Note that ACT considers this version to be beta-
> quality.
Please don't put more versions of GDB into the archive unless you
really need to...
I'm told that Ada support in 6.0 is better than in 5.3. Does ACT have
patches for that version
I'd like to use quilt for managing some of my own packages, which means I'd
have to have it in the archive first.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
actly the same java code, native code, .properties files etc?
I do not know. Quite probably not, but it appears to be more or less
the same source.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
u.org/software/classpath
> * License : GPL with special exception
> Description : GNU Classpath is a set of essential libraries for
> supporting the Java language
I believe that GNU Classpath is shipped with GCC (at least as of 3.1).
Is there any advantage to shipping it s
although I'm skeptical that a project with this many bells and
whistles is really fully audited. Its source code is enormous compared
to a minimalistic performer like vsftpd. It targets a somewhat
different user.
But please describe it in terms of what it offers, rather than how it
compares
other programs,
> and the normal model of execution does a chroot to the logged in user's
> directory immediately after authentication.
>
> License is GPL2.
Sure it's GPL... but it seems to depend on tcpserver, which is in
non-free. What do you pl
provide
> an awful lot of security, and a determined attacker might find a way
> to circumvent it, but it's already a lot better than a completely open
> account.
Don't even bother :) Use command restriction. man sshd(8), search for
command=.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
e Debian Free Software Guidlines. lmbench can
not go in main. What's worse is that 'modified the benchmarks' is not
terribly well defined; if you need to apply a patch to the Debian
package, will it even produce publishable numbers?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software Debian Security Team
Unless you've found a different version of lmbench than I see, lmbench is in
fact non-free. Distribution of results is severely limited. While it
includes a COPYING file, it also includes a more complete and more
restrictive license.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Debia
24 matches
Mail list logo