On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 11:53:34AM -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 02:15 +1200, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
> > I talked with Dennis about maintaining deb package for Debian today, but
> > just before I upload my package to mentors.debian.net, I found this ITP
> > bug. It's 3 mo
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 05:06:02PM +0100, Tommaso Moroni wrote:
> Hi!
>
Hello, I CC my reply to the BTS and [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well, hope you
wouldn't mind.
> I'm tidying up the wnpp bugs on the Debian BTS by looking for "inactive" ITPs.
> I saw that some time ago you filed an ITP for gnochm, s
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 09:56:35PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> and i suggest, as a combination of them, could ttf-arphic-newsung provide (and
> conflict?) both package ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp and ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp ? is it
> better?
>
Can tfm-arphic-bsmi00lp and tfm-arphic-gbsn00lp use ttf-arph
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:05:05PM +0800, Kanru Chen wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Kanru Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: ttf-arphic-newsung
> Version : 1.2.6
> Upstream Author : FireFly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.study-a
4 matches
Mail list logo