On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 09:56:35PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > and i suggest, as a combination of them, could ttf-arphic-newsung provide (and > conflict?) both package ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp and ttf-arphic-gbsn00lp ? is it > better? > Can tfm-arphic-bsmi00lp and tfm-arphic-gbsn00lp use ttf-arphic-newsung? I think they must explicitly depend on the corresponding ttf-arphic-* package. Maybe a tfm-arphic-newsung package can resolve this problem. I heard that Asho Yeh (from moto) is working on it.
And I think "conflict" shouldn't be introduced in the package even when dependency problems are resolved, because there is no real conflict between the firefly newsung and the old arphic font. No harm to install both of them. Please read Debian Policy 7.3 about conflicting relation. -- Best Regards, Carlos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]