sean finney wrote:
hi nick,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 06:37:49PM -0400, Nick Lewycky wrote:
>This packages is so non free that cannot even be included in the
>non-free section without an installer. It's also only for i386.
>dpkg will not be able to track its files.
"without an installer"? This
Hey, this is Lisa! One of my friends said she knew
you and we should get in contact with each other.
I just got my videocamera working so we can talk as long
as you want at my website and it doesn't cost you anything
if you wanna watch/see me!
Just Copy and Paste the URL below in your Broswe
hi nick,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 06:37:49PM -0400, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> >This packages is so non free that cannot even be included in the
> >non-free section without an installer. It's also only for i386.
> >dpkg will not be able to track its files.
>
> "without an installer"? This package *is*
Re: L o an A p proval Notification and Conditions
Mon, 26 Jul 2004 20:06:36 -0500
Dear Applicant:
My name is Stewart Lane and I am a mo r tgage b
roker that
was assigned to your case.
I just review your application and glad to inform you that
we can approve you.
Please click on http://www.
If you haven't started packaging rhythmbox-applet yet, I can send you a
preliminary package I put together for 0.1.1 that you might want to base
your work on. It hasn't been tested and probably needs its dependencies
adjusted, but it's lintian- and linda-clean.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Nick Lewycky wrote:
[snip]
This packages is so non free that cannot even be included in the
non-free section without an installer. It's also only for i386.
dpkg will not be able to track its files.
"without an installer"? This package *is* an installer!
Then the package
Nick Lewycky wrote:
[snip]
> >This packages is so non free that cannot even be included in the
> >non-free section without an installer. It's also only for i386.
> >dpkg will not be able to track its files.
>
> "without an installer"? This package *is* an installer!
Then the package should probab
Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 12:37:14PM -0400, Nick Lewycky wrote:
* Package name: folding
Version : 4.00
Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This field is missing.
Sorry. That should be:
Upstream Author : Vijay Pande <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL
[changing from d-wnpp to d-qa, it's probably better, and dropping
d-release]
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 03:39:56AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> After having given the WNPP code a little face lifting I now remembered
> my old offer and quickly hacked it together (patch for the WNPP code
> attache
Hi Norbert,
if you plan to upload this, please join the pkg-voip team on alioth. We
have a README in the SVN and could also offer sponsoring the upload.
If you have any more questions, feel free to mail us at the address in
CC.
--
Best regards,
Kilian
Am Mo, den 26.07.2004 schrieb Norbert T
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I have orphaned this package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I will orphan this package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I am orphaning this package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I have orphaned this package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the librsync package.
The package description is:
librsync is the next generation of librsync, and provides flexible
checksum-based differencing. The main application at the moment in
rproxy, but the library should eventually be generally usef
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I intend to orphan the rdiff-backup package.
The package description is:
rdiff-backup is a script that backs up one directory to another. The target
directory ends up a copy of the source directory, but extra reverse diffs
are stored in a special subdirectory of
Wmono
Volumizer Doubles, Triples, Quadruples and MORE! ... not just volume of
ejaculate, but
intensity and power of 0rgasms. "
IT WILL ABSOLUTELY BLOW YOUR MIND"
Enjoy a bigger, more impressive load of cum ejaculation.
Experience orgasms that go on and on
and on!
Best sexual experiences of a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xmms-jackasyn
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Guenter Geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gige.xdv.org/soft/libjackasyn
* License : GPL
Description : JACK Output plugin for xmms
This plugin allows xm
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2004-07-26
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: iaxcomm
Version : 0.0.20040228
Upstream Author : Michael Van Donselaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://iaxclient.sourceforge.net/iaxcomm/
* License : GPL
Description : So
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
On dim, 2004-07-25 at 11:17 +0200, Igor Stroh wrote:
However, if you want the docs to go into python-gtk2 instead of an extra
No, I was just talking about the official API for pygtk, and also
speaking in a general way (mailing the maintainer for foo before
packaging
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: rhythmbox-applet
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Paul Kuliniewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~kuliniew/rhythmbox-applet/
* License : GPL
Description : an applet for GNOME panel t
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2004-07-26
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: swami
Version : 0.9.2
Upstream Author : Josh Green
* URL : http://swami.sf.net/
* License : GPL
Description : soundfont editor
Swami - Sample Waveforms and Audio f
Thanks, I somehow missed this. The ITP (bug #251715) is 57 days old
though, so I plan to proceed with my packaging. I'll contact the other
packager though.
I plan on building it with gcj and putting it in main.
Cheers,
Shaun
> There is an ITP for swt open. Do you intend to put them in main (usi
El 23/Apr/2004 a las 13:49:29, Javier Linares escribió:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:34:41AM +0100, Javier Linares wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: digitemp
> > Version : 3.2.0
> > Upstream Author : Brian C. Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL
retitle 254390 ITA: gtk-gnutella -- shares files in a peer to peer
network
owner 254390 !
thanks
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 254390 ITA: gtk-gnutella -- shares files in a peer to peer
Bug#254390: O: gtk-gnutella -- shares files in a peer to peer network
Changed Bug title.
> network
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> owner 254390 !
Bug#254390: ITA:
Well, guys,
I'm really pleased to tell you all that the Alioth project 'pkg-qemu'
has been approved some hours ago, and then that we can start to work
right now =)
I would first of all ask all interested people to subscribe to a mailing
list, namely [EMAIL PROTECTED], so that we don't
need to Cc:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>
> Several months ago it was proposed (from the RM IIRC) to introduce
> new WNPP tags: RFH (request for help) and ITH/OTH (offer to help)
>
> I myself have to take a part of the blame that the discussion
> died out since I proposed to technically imple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 120209 ITP: rox -- Risc Os on X - desktop environment
Bug#120209: ITA: rox -- Risc Os on X - desktop environment
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Dnia sobota 24 lipca 2004 15:18, Francesco Paolo Lovergine napisał:
> there are a few people (also in #rox) interested in having rox-filer and
> rox environment in debian and (possibly) sarge. I'd like to work with you
> and them in order to have working and policy-compliant packages as soon
> a
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:40:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Eh? A BOM (Byte Order Marker) is only needed where there's confusion
about what the byte order is. It's needed for UTF-16 (which is a fairly
decent demonstration of why UTF-16 is a Bad Thing), but not UTF-8. There
may be desirable to mark a file as being in UTF-8, but calli
32 matches
Mail list logo
