Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2002 00:12:59 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145013: fixed in docbook-ebnf 1.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2002 00:02:32 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#144787: fixed in mkdecbootcd 0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 07 May 2002 00:00:18 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#143530: fixed in wmufo 1.0.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2002 23:59:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#108208: fixed in libfont-afm-perl 1.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2002 22:30:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#144321: fixed in libdate-pcalc-perl 1.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 06 May 2002 21:57:59 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#140168: fixed in fnorb 1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 02:20:18PM -0300, Gustavo R. Franco wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-06
> Severity: wishlist
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> * Package name: kernel-patch-2.4-rmap
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Rik van Rie
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: postgis
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : Dave Blasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Upstream Author : Chris Hodgson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Upstream Author : Paul Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Upstream Author :
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 138819 ITP: glchess
Bug#138819: RFP: glchess -- a 3D chess interface
Changed Bug title.
> I`m going to package it...
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> Version : 0.4.6
Unknown command or malformed arguments to comma
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-06
Followup-For: Bug #138819
I`m going to package it. Please refer with questions direcly to me...
Oliver
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Version: 2002-05-06
A Package of mod-accounting would be quite nice.
Description: Accounting module for apache
mod_accounting is a simple Apache module that can record
traffic statistics into a database (bytes in/out per http
request).
.
At the moment mysql a
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-06
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: kernel-patch-2.4-rmap
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.surriel.com/patches/
* License
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pymol
Version : 0.80
Upstream Author : Warren L. DeLano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pymol.sf.net
* License : Python
Description : Molecular Graphics System
PyMOL is a
Hi,
I noticed that althought there is a ITP bugnumber #107496 there is no such
package yet. I have packaged libgtkscintilla and the plan is to also package
phpmole. Is it ok if I go forward and ITP libgtkscintilla?
Regards,
Alwyn Schoeman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-06
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dacode
Version : 1.4.0
Upstream Author : Dacode development team ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://www.dacode.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Performant and full-feature
Hi Matt,
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 12:10:57AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>OK, there have been a lot of people who have expressed interest in packaging
>OpenOffice for Debian over the past year, and they have opened 3 separate
>wnpp bugs, but so far there are still no official packages.
not offici
On Mon, 06 Mai 2002, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> OK, there have been a lot of people who have expressed interest in packaging
> OpenOffice for Debian over the past year, and they have opened 3 separate
> wnpp bugs, but so far there are still no official packages.
>
> Version 1.0 of OpenOffice has now
>
> Version 1.0 of OpenOffice has now been released, and I would very much like
> to see it In Debian, as it clearly has the potential to be an important free
> software component.
>
> Are any of you actively working on packages, or do you know who is?
something like this ?
http://lists.debian.
18 matches
Mail list logo
