No subject

unsubscribe end -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: /var permissions ???

On Sun, Jun 13, 1999 at 06:14:45PM -0400, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote: > Hi, > > I recently moved /var to the partition windoze used to occupy. > > To do this (after reformatting the partition): > # mkdir /vartemp > # mount /dev/hda1 -t ext2 /vartemp > # cp -R /var/* /vartemp > > I then set up /etc

Re: A WinNT 4.0 registry editor for Un*x?

I would like a copy of this file on the registry. jm On Fri, 22 May 1998, Stephen Carpenter wrote: > Ulisses Alonso wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > Does such thing exist? > > nothing exists that I know of...however...I do have a file which describes the > registryit gives byte offsetts...all so

Re: Big HD problems - How stuffed am I?

I had a similar problem with a bad IDE controller once. If you've upgraded your kernel recently you might need to look at the kernel docs. related IDE chipsets and see if yours has any known issues. You might also want to check for loose cables, poor cable routing, bad power supply etc. I doubt

Re: Internet telephony?

On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 12:55:29PM -0800, Paul Nathan Puri wrote: > > Is anyone aware of internet telephony software that could run on debian? > Preferable but not exclusively open source. Check out Speak Freely . I did have some trouble getting it to wor

Re: I can't beleive this

On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 02:40:35PM -0500, Michael Stenner wrote: > > Re: "They are willing to sacrifice fine-grained control for simplicity" > > But it shouldn't be an "exclusive or". As time has passed, I have come > to respect the people who view computers as tools. They don't want to > have

Re: Slink upgrade and xwindows

On Tue, Mar 16, 1999 at 02:40:30AM +0100, Laurent PICOULEAU wrote: > > > > 2) Edit /etc/init.d/xdm and insert an 'exit 0' at the top of the file. > >Xdm will not even start or listen with this option. > > > Thanks for these suggestions. I'll get an eye on these possibilities ASAP. Or just d

Re: Best hardware?

On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 12:42:17PM -0400, Bart Szyszka wrote: > Hello, > > Can anyone recommend some sites with good reviews of hardware for > Linux? I'm looking for something like www.computers.com , except > that they'd recommend the best graphics cards, monitors, etc. for > Linux instead of for

Re: Best hardware?

On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Bart Szyszka wrote: > > Well see, that's what I mean. There's hardware that is great on Windows, but > there just aren't any drivers for it in Linux. Well, like I said the vast majority of Win9X only hardware works very poorly even in Win9x and the majori

Re: Best hardware?

On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 05:14:39PM -0400, Bart Szyszka wrote: > > Well, like I said the vast majority of Win9X only hardware works very poorly > > even in Win9x > Not from my experiences. Printers generally work well. Win-printers normally share the following problems in Windows: 1. Completely wo

Re: Middle mouse button behavior changed?

I use debian testing on two computers. On both USB mouses still work OK. PS/2 mouses have changed their behavior. The scrolling direction was reversed as if "natural scrolling" was set in mouse configuration.

Testing. AutomaticLogin. Switching users

I haven't used this feature for more than a month, so I don't know when it was changed in testing distribution. Previously all was easy. There was text console under Alt-F1 to Alt-F6 and X-window session under Alt-F7. Now, when AutomaticLogin is not set in gdm3 config, text consoles are Alt-F3 to

Re: networking

On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Pol Hallen wrote: > I suggests him to separate each networks: > > floor1 - 192.168.1.0/24 > floor2 - 192.168.2.0/24 > floor3 - 192.168.3.0/24 > floor4 - 192.168.4.0/24 Why do you want to separate it? And if you really need separation then why just on floor borders? Is your o

Re: networking

On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Pol Hallen wrote: > >Why do you want to separate it? > > try to discover a network problem when there're many many devices > online... if you separate is become "easy" audit network You divide number of computers affected by a problem by 4 and add many new problems caused b